This statement is a fallacy. All crimes, whether minor or major, are meant to be investigated. The entire criminal justice system, from the police to the courts, is built on the premise of looking into illegal activities. While there may be challenges in some cases, such as lack of evidence or witness intimidation, that doesn't mean the crimes are not investigable. It just means that more effort and resources may be required to bring the truth to light.
It depends on the context. In some corrupt or failed states, it might seem like the crimes of powerful individuals cannot be investigated due to their influence, political connections, or control over the legal system. However, this is a breakdown of the proper functioning of society and the rule of law. In an ideal legal framework, there is no such thing as un - investigable crimes.
Definitely fiction. Democratic societies have independent judicial systems and law enforcement agencies. These entities are obligated to investigate any reported crime regardless of who the perpetrator might be. Transparency and accountability are key principles, which means that the idea of un - investigable crimes goes against the very fabric of a democratic society.
Fiction. There is no evidence to suggest that HRC (assuming it refers to Hillary Clinton) has any connection to child sex crimes. These are baseless conspiracy theories often spread without any factual basis.
Fact. If HRC has been involved in initiatives or policies that aim to protect children from sex crimes, it is a fact. Many public figures work towards creating awareness, better laws, and support systems for the protection of children.
Yes, it is. 'Future Crimes' is a fictional book that takes you on an imaginative journey.
1421 is rather ambiguous. To figure out if it's fact or fiction, we need to know what it specifically represents. Maybe it's a reference to a historical event, a fictional story element, or something else entirely.
It's a blend of both. The film incorporates real events and people, but also takes some creative liberties to tell a compelling story.
Murder is often the top crime in detective fiction. It creates high stakes and a complex mystery to solve. Theft can also be a common one, especially when it involves valuable items like jewels or important documents. Another is blackmail, which adds a layer of secrecy and moral dilemma to the story.
In an academic or professional setting, mistaking fact for fiction can harm your work. If you base a research paper on false information thinking it's true, your research will be flawed. Also, in legal matters, misidentifying facts can lead to unjust rulings if the wrong information is presented as fact.
To distinguish fact from fiction in these stories, we should check the sources. Reliable sources like scientific journals, well - known historical records, and established news agencies are more likely to report facts. For instance, if a story about a new species discovery is reported by a respected scientific journal, it's probably a fact. On the other hand, stories that spread through social media without any proper verification, such as some outlandish claims about time - traveling, are often fiction. Also, we can analyze the plausibility. If a story goes against known physical laws, like a claim that a human can fly without any aid in normal conditions, it's fiction.
It could be either. If 'the offer' is something like a job offer, it might be a fact if all the terms are real and binding. However, if it's an offer that seems too good to be true, like getting a million dollars for doing nothing, it's likely fiction.