Why do some people think 'Star Trek' is bad science fiction?

Some might think so because Star Wars introduced a lot of fantasy elements into science fiction. It has things like the Force, which is more of a magical concept. This blurred the lines between pure science - based speculation in science fiction and made it more like a space fantasy.

No way. 'Star Trek' is a classic in science - fiction. It has a lot of great things going for it. The technology depicted, while fictional, is often based on scientific theories to some extent. The stories are engaging, and the characters are memorable. It has also spawned multiple successful spin - offs, which shows its popularity and the strength of its concept.

Many think this because the singularity concept often involves ideas that seem very far - fetched. For example, an AI that can rewrite its own code to become infinitely more intelligent is currently beyond our technological capabilities. Our current AI systems are limited by the data we feed them and the algorithms we design. Until we see some major breakthroughs that suggest otherwise, the singularity will remain in the realm of science fiction for most people.

Well, some might argue that 'Star Trek' isn't science fiction because it often focuses more on the human and social aspects within its futuristic settings. It uses the science - fiction backdrop mainly as a canvas to explore complex relationships, moral and ethical dilemmas, and different cultures. For example, the interactions between the various alien species on the Enterprise are more about understanding cultural differences and cooperation, which are more in the realm of sociology and anthropology rather than pure science - fiction concepts like advanced physics or technological innovation for the sake of it.

Well, the fact that Star Wars has a lot of elements that seem more like fantasy than science makes people think it's bad science fiction. The Jedi's ability to see the future and have premonitions is not scientific at all. And the whole idea of a 'dark side' and 'light side' of the Force is more of a moral and spiritual concept rather than a scientific one. It blurs the line between science and magic too much for some to consider it good science fiction.

Because there is no scientific evidence yet to prove that time travel is possible. All we have are theories like Einstein's relativity which suggest it might be possible in certain extreme conditions, but we haven't been able to achieve it in reality.

Some might misunderstand it as science fiction because the idea of evolution can seem very strange at first. But it's a scientific theory. They may be confused by the complex concepts and think it's just made - up like in science fiction.

Maybe they don't get the imaginative concepts and futuristic elements. To them, it might not fit the typical sci-fi mold.

The show 'Star Trek Discovery' could be considered not science fiction due to its departure from the traditional narrative structures of the genre. Often, science fiction uses the setting of the future or outer space to comment on current social and political issues in an allegorical way. If 'Star Trek Discovery' fails to do this effectively or instead focuses too much on internal power struggles within the crew or on action - adventure elements without the underlying scientific or speculative context, it may not be seen as true science fiction.

Star Trek is considered science fiction because it features futuristic technology like warp drives, transporters, and phasers. These are not things we have in the present day, but are based on scientific concepts and the idea of what could be possible in the future.