Mostly not. While there were real problems in the mortgage - backed securities market like misaligned incentives and lax regulation, calling them 'conspiracy' stories is a bit of a stretch. For example, the misrating of securities was more due to flaws in the rating models and the over - optimism in the housing market rather than a grand conspiracy.
No. The mortgage - backed securities problems were mainly due to systemic failures in the financial system. There were mistakes in risk assessment, and the securitization process had flaws. People like to create conspiracy stories because it's easier to blame a hidden, coordinated plot rather than understand the complex web of economic and financial factors that led to the issues. The reality is that it was a mess of bad business decisions, over - reliance on models, and a lack of proper regulatory oversight rather than a conspiracy.
In general, no. There were indeed issues with mortgage - backed securities, such as the failure to accurately assess the risk of default on the underlying mortgages. However, conspiracy stories often lack evidence. The financial crisis related to these securities was more a result of a combination of factors including the housing bubble, easy credit, and the complexity of the financial products themselves. Banks were also chasing profits in a competitive environment, but that doesn't necessarily mean there was a coordinated conspiracy.
One common conspiracy story is that big banks deliberately misrated the mortgage - backed securities. They knew the underlying mortgages were of poor quality but still rated them highly to sell them off easily and make huge profits. Another is that there was some sort of insider trading involved where certain players had information about the impending collapse of the mortgage - backed securities market and used it to their advantage by short - selling or getting out early.
Mostly, they are conspiracy theories. There is no solid evidence to prove the existence of an all - powerful 'Illuminati' secretly controlling the world. While there have been secret societies throughout history, the claims about the Illuminati often lack any real - world proof.
I don't think so. Usually, such names suggest fictional or imaginative concepts rather than being based on real events.
After researching the reasons based on the facts and events, writing a book and writing a theory is protected by copyright. Movies made based on the facts of the case may or may not be protected by film copyright. The specific situation depended on the copyright of the film and whether the film was created based on facts.
The movie 'Conspiracy' is based on a true story, though certain elements might have been fictionalized or exaggerated to make it more engaging for the audience.
It's a mixed bag. Some conspiracy movies have roots in actual events, but they might exaggerate or fictionalize certain aspects for entertainment value.
No, Violin Conspiracy is not based on a true story. It's a creation of the author's imagination, although it might draw on common themes and tropes to make it engaging.
Well, not all conspiracy movies are based on true stories. Some are completely fictional creations, while others draw loose inspiration from real-life incidents and theories.
No, it's not. 'Conspiracy of Hearts' is a fictional work created for entertainment purposes.
No, it's not. Echelon Conspiracy is a fictional story created for entertainment purposes.