The phrase 'long name no can say story' is quite puzzling. It could potentially be a creative or accidental misphrasing. If we assume it means something like 'A long name doesn't allow one to tell a story', it could imply that the length or complexity of a name gets in the way of creating or sharing a story related to it. For example, a long - winded brand name might not immediately inspire a brand story that is easy to communicate to consumers. Without more context, it's difficult to fully understand what is meant.
Maybe it means that a long name doesn't convey a story. For instance, a long, technical name of a machine might not have an obvious story associated with it at first glance.
It's a bit of a jumbled phrase. If we break it down, 'long name' is clear enough, but 'no can say' is bad grammar. It might be trying to say that a long - named entity doesn't have a story that can be easily described. For example, a long - named historical figure from a very niche area of study may not have a well - known story outside of that specific field.
No, not really. It seems like a jumble of words. Maybe 'hansbury' is a brand or a name, 'pathetic' is an emotion, 'amore' is love, but 'another long story' just makes it more confusing.
Honestly, 'horses name off never ending story' is not a common or easily understood phrase. It might be a unique way of expressing an idea. It could potentially refer to a story that is ongoing and has horses in it, but the focus is not on their names. It could also be a play on words or a very creative way of starting a story concept. For instance, it could be the start of a story where the lack of named horses is a central mystery that the story gradually unfolds.
I'm not entirely sure what this specific phrase means. It seems like rather broken English. It could potentially be something like 'A long name can't tell a story' but that's just a guess.
This phrase is really puzzling. 'Brother can't cun story' could potentially be a new or unique way of expressing that a brother is unable to participate in or complete a story - related task. However, since 'cun' is an unknown term, we can only guess. It might be a new slang or just a very personal expression. For instance, if 'cun' was meant to be 'create', then it would be clear that the brother has trouble creating a story.
Maybe it means the story of different kinds of life on the pavement.
I can't really make proper sense of it. 'Fingered' is a strange word to use in this context. It might be a completely new or misused expression. If it was 'Mom featured in the story', that would be easier to understand, but as it is, it's just very unclear.
This phrase seems rather puzzling. At first glance, it doesn't conform to standard English grammar or semantics. But if we were to be imaginative, we could view 'book is sleeping' as the book lying dormant or unread, and'sheee' might be an error or a creative flourish, with'story' being what the book holds. So perhaps it's a very unorthodox way of expressing that a book with a story is currently not in use.
No idea. It doesn't seem to follow normal English grammar or semantics. Maybe it's a made - up phrase for a creative writing piece.
I'm not familiar with the word 'nudisy'. If it's a misspelling, and it was meant to be 'nasty', then it could be a rather unflattering story about a mom. But as it stands, it's hard to make sense of.
This 'people can lick too scary story' is really strange. I think it might be a very confused or creative way of trying to say something about people's reaction to scary stories. But as it stands, it's not a proper English expression. It could potentially mean that people have some sort of odd reaction to very scary stories, but that's just speculation without more context.