The Blind Side: Truth vs Fiction - What are the main differences?

Well, truth in the blind side is based on real events, facts, and experiences. Fiction, on the other hand, is made - up. For example, if we're talking about a story set in the blind side of a city. The truth might involve real social issues like poverty and crime in that area. Fiction could create a fantasy world with made - up characters and events that don't really exist in that blind side.

One key difference is the portrayal of the family's motives. In the movie, they seem like completely altruistic saviors. In fact, there may have been more complex reasons at play. Another is the extent of Michael Oher's academic struggles. The movie might have exaggerated it a bit for dramatic effect.

The burial truth typically pertains to the actual facts and practices associated with burying the dead. This could include things like legal requirements, environmental considerations in modern burials, and historical burial customs. In contrast, burial fiction can be highly imaginative. It may feature things like ancient burial grounds with hidden treasures or undead rising from graves, which are far from the reality of burial where the main focus is on laying the deceased to rest in a respectful and proper manner.

The movie 'The Blind Side' altered real events in multiple ways. It streamlined the story to focus on the relationship between Michael Oher and the Tuohy family. In reality, there were likely more side - stories and distractions. Also, the movie might have downplayed the role of other people in Michael's life who also contributed to his growth. It made the Tuohy family seem like the sole catalysts for his success, which was not entirely accurate. Additionally, the movie added some Hollywood - style emotional moments that may not have occurred exactly as shown in real life.

In 'The Blind Side', some facts are that the general idea of a family taking in a disadvantaged youth is based on real acts of kindness. However, some fictional elements might be the overly dramatized sports scenes for the sake of entertainment. For example, the way Michael's football talent is presented might be exaggerated a bit to make the movie more exciting.

The key difference often lies in the level of violence. In truth, manhunts by law enforcement are highly regulated procedures aiming to arrest suspects with minimum harm. In fiction, like in movies or some novels, manhunts can be overly dramatized with extreme and often unrealistic levels of violence. Also, in reality, manhunts rely on a network of evidence, witnesses, and legal procedures, while in fiction, it might just be about a lone hero chasing the bad guy without much regard for such things.

In 'Narcos', the level of violence is sometimes dramatized. While the real drug trade was extremely violent, the show might enhance it for shock value. For example, some of the shoot - outs and torture scenes might be more elaborate in the show. Truthfully, the real - life investigations were also more about intelligence gathering and paperwork than what is shown. The show focuses a lot on the action - packed parts, but in reality, a large part of law enforcement's work was painstaking research, building cases slowly over time, and dealing with political and bureaucratic hurdles.

The truth in 'The Watcher' context could be the simple facts like the location of the house, the real - life complaints or uneasiness of the homeowners. However, fiction takes over to create a sense of mystery and horror. It might introduce elements like a long - standing curse on the property or a secret society watching the house. Fiction uses these to heighten the drama, while the truth is often more mundane and based on real - world circumstances.

Truth in air might refer to facts like the composition of air (mostly nitrogen, oxygen, etc.). Fiction could be ideas like air being made of magic substances. The key difference is that truth is based on scientific evidence. For example, we know air pressure exists through experiments. Fiction, on the other hand, is often just creative ideas without scientific basis.

Well, truth in 'Argo' pertains to the historical context. It was a real - life operation. Fiction elements might include the way characters are portrayed to a certain extent. Maybe some characters were combined or their personalities tweaked for the movie's narrative flow. The real operation was complex, and the movie had to simplify and dramatize parts of it to tell the story in a more accessible way on screen. This is a common practice in movies based on true events. In 'Argo', the core of the story, the rescue mission, is true, but there are fictional aspects interwoven to create a more compelling cinematic experience.