Most of these horror stories are not reliable on their own. The scientific community conducts extensive research on vaccines like zostavax. They look at large numbers of people to determine the safety and effectiveness. A single horror story may not represent the overall experience of the vast majority of people who receive the vaccine. There are proper procedures in place to monitor and evaluate any potential issues with vaccines, and these are more reliable than individual anecdotes.
There might be stories about the long - term effects of zostavax. Some people claim to have had ongoing health problems after getting the vaccine. For instance, they might have developed chronic fatigue, joint pain, or other unexplained symptoms that they suspect are related to the vaccine. However, it's important to note that in many cases, it's difficult to prove a direct link between the vaccine and these symptoms without further scientific investigation.
The 'Gardasil horror stories' are not reliable at all. Scientific research is the gold standard when it comes to evaluating the safety and effectiveness of a vaccine like Gardasil. While individual experiences may vary, large - scale studies have shown that Gardasil is generally safe and effective. These horror stories often lack proper medical verification and are more likely to be based on misinformation or unfounded fears. For example, a person might feel dizzy after the shot, but it could be due to anxiety rather than a real side effect of the vaccine.
No. These stories are not reliable at all. They are mainly spread by anti - North Korea forces to smear the country. North Korea is a country that values its people and has been working hard to improve people's living conditions.
It depends. Some stories on well - known platforms like Creepypasta can be quite reliable in terms of being well - written and often having elements that seem real. However, many are fictional works. On Reddit, the stories shared by users might be based on real events but are also sometimes exaggerated for the sake of horror.
You can find reliable accounts of these stories in well - researched books. For example, books on true crime or paranormal investigations often cover these stories in detail. Some popular true crime authors like Ann Rule have written about real - life horror cases. Another place is documentaries. There are many documentary channels that produce shows about these events. For instance, Netflix has some great documentaries on serial killers and other true horror stories. Also, some official police records or court documents can be a source, although they might be a bit harder to access.
Not really. New UFO stories often come from eyewitness accounts which can be unreliable. People might misinterpret what they see, like confusing a drone or a weather balloon for a UFO.
Some are reliable. If they are based on historical records, personal experiences of reliable individuals, or scientific research, they can be quite trustworthy.
Not really. Many new bigfoot stories lack solid evidence. They are often based on brief sightings or unclear evidence like strange noises or what could be misidentified footprints. People might be seeing other large animals like bears or moose and misinterpreting them as bigfoot.
Well, it depends. While many of the stories in Fortean Times lack solid scientific evidence, some of them might be based on real experiences that just haven't been fully explained yet. However, in general, we can't consider them reliable in the sense of established facts.
No. Most online supernatural stories are not reliable. They are often based on rumors, exaggerations, or the overactive imaginations of the people who tell them.