Maybe because short fiction is concise and packs a lot of meaning into a small space. The beauty of it lies in its simplicity and the immediate impact it has on the reader. If we start to explain it, we risk over - analyzing and diluting that impact. Also, different people might get different things from the same short story based on their own life experiences. So rather than having a single explanation, it's better to leave it open for multiple interpretations.
Well, short fiction is meant to be a quick and immersive experience. Explaining it might break the spell. It's like when you listen to a beautiful piece of music. You don't want someone to constantly interrupt and explain every note. The same goes for short fiction. You want to let the story wash over you and form your own thoughts without someone else's analysis shoved in your face.
One reason could be that short fiction often has an open - ended nature. Each reader can have their own unique interpretation, so explaining it might limit those individual understandings. For example, a short story might use symbolism in a very personal way, and forcing an explanation could take away the magic of discovery for the reader.
Because short fiction is often meant to be interpreted by the reader on their own. Each person can bring their own unique perspective and understanding to it.
I think it could mean that there's no need to provide explanations for short fictional works. Maybe the focus is on just experiencing the story without going into detailed analysis.
We should 'don't wait to speak pulp fiction' because it has so many elements that are worthy of discussion. Its dialogues are sharp and witty, which can be analyzed from a writing perspective. The movie also has a distinct visual style that influenced many other filmmakers. By speaking about it without waiting, we can share our insights on these aspects and also learn from others' perspectives. It's a great way to engage in a cultural conversation about an important piece of cinema.
Maybe it's because creating really good fan fiction takes a lot of creativity and time. Not everyone has that to spare.
Science fiction typically doesn't warrant worry because it often exaggerates or fictionalizes concepts that are far from being realized or having a direct negative impact on us. It's a genre that focuses on imagination and possibility rather than presenting concrete, pressing issues.
I don't have the exact date for when 'Don't Explain' was written. It could vary depending on various factors such as the author's inspiration and publication process. Maybe you can try looking it up in a literary database or asking an expert in that field.
Maybe it's because some fanfictions have poor writing or don't match our expectations of the original story.
There could be various reasons. Sometimes the plot is too predictable, or the characters are not well-developed. Also, the style of storytelling might not appeal to everyone's taste.
One reason could be that short stories don't give readers enough time to really get attached to the characters and the world. Another factor is that they might not be as visible in the market due to limited publicity.
Well, not everyone likes to be scared. Some people are very sensitive and horror stories can have a negative impact on their mental state. It might make them feel uneasy or even cause anxiety, so it's better not to tell such stories.