Is 'Frakes Fact or Fiction' a reliable source for information?

It depends. If it's a well - researched and verified list, it can be reliable. But if it's just some random compilation without proper fact - checking, it may not be.

Yes. 'Fargo Fact or Fiction' can be a reliable source. It likely has a process of fact - checking. If it's a well - known and respected platform, it should be reliable.

Yes, it can be. 'Food Fact or Fiction' often does research and presents evidence - based information. However, like any source, it's always good to cross - check facts.

It depends. Some parts of it might be based on scientific facts while others could be fictional for the sake of entertainment. For example, the general appearance of some dinosaurs might be based on fossil evidence, but their behaviors in the show could be exaggerated.

Well, it depends. Some parts of it might be reliable, but some could be just speculation. There are many shows or books with this title, and not all are based on solid scientific evidence.

It could be either. Some sources claiming 'diabetes free' might be based on facts like proper diet and exercise can help manage and potentially prevent diabetes in some cases. But it might also be fiction if it makes exaggerated claims. For example, if it says a single magic pill can make you diabetes - free without any lifestyle changes, that's likely fiction.

Truth is usually a reliable source as it's based on facts. Fiction, on the other hand, isn't reliable for factual information since it's made-up.

Since I don't know the contents of the 'fact or fiction green book', I can't say for sure if it's reliable.

It depends. Some parts might be reliable while others could be inaccurate. If it's based on well - researched historical documents and studies, it can be a good source. But if it's full of unfounded opinions or misinformation, then it's not reliable.

It depends. Some people think Raw Story is reliable, while others have doubts. It's best to cross-reference with multiple sources.