How can we distinguish fact from fiction in 'Killers of the Flower Moon'?

It is based on real events, so it's mainly fact. The story is rooted in the Osage Indian murders that took place in the 1920s in Oklahoma. The movie and the book it's based on aim to depict this dark chapter in American history where members of the Osage tribe were targeted for their oil wealth.

The movie uses historical research as a basis for the truth. So, events like the Osage people being targeted for their land and wealth are true. Fiction is used to make it more engaging. For example, the personal relationships between characters may be fictionalized to some extent.

The fact is in the historical context of the Osage murders and the exploitation of their wealth. The fictional aspects could be in the way the story is presented, for example, the focus on specific characters' emotions and personal stories. These might be fictionalized to make the story more engaging while still being true to the overall historical facts. The movie/book uses real events as a backbone and then builds on it with some fictional elements to create a more complete narrative.

Look for evidence. If something is claimed but there's no evidence to back it up, it might be fiction. For instance, if a story claims that a certain plant can cure all diseases but there are no scientific trials to prove it, it's probably fictional.

Definitely fiction. Killers of the Flower Moon presents a fictional narrative crafted by the author's imagination, though it might draw inspiration from real-world elements.

One way is to look at the sources. If it comes from reliable historical records like official documents, diaries of the time, or works of respected historians, it's more likely to be fact. For example, the existence of Caesar in Roman history is supported by numerous historical texts.

One way to distinguish is by researching the real - life events related to the mafia in that era. In Goodfellas, some things like the power struggles within the mafia families are based on fact. But the movie might fictionalize the personal lives of the characters a bit more. For example, the love affairs shown might be dramatized. Also, the way the characters are always in danger and facing close calls all the time is probably a bit of a fictional exaggeration to keep the tension high in the movie.

Well, one big difference is in the character portrayals. In the factual account, the real people had complex motives that might be simplified in the fictionalized versions. For example, the actions of the killers in real life were likely driven by a combination of greed, prejudice, and the social context of the time. But in some fictional takes, it could be made more one - dimensional for the sake of the story.

One way is to research the current state of science. If a science fiction story presents a technology or phenomenon that has no basis in current scientific knowledge and no plausible path to development, it's probably just a fictional element. However, sometimes science fiction can be prescient. For example, some early works that predicted wireless communication were initially thought of as pure fantasy but later became a fact. Also, consider the purpose of the fictional element. If it's mainly to create a sense of wonder or to drive the plot in a unique way rather than being based on real science, it's more likely to be fiction.

Definitely. The story in 'Killers of the Flower Moon' is set against a backdrop of actual historical circumstances and characters, making it historical fiction. It weaves a narrative around true events to create an engaging fictional account.