What are the main differences between the true story behind 'The Strangers 2' and the movie's plot?

One main difference is that the movie might exaggerate the characters' personalities for dramatic effect. In real life, the oilmen might not have been as extremely ruthless as Daniel Plainview in the movie. Also, the movie simplifies some of the complex business and social relationships that would have existed in the real - life oil boom. It focuses more on the individual's struggle rather than the broader community aspects that were surely involved in the real story.

One main difference could be the dramatization in the movie. In real life, the events might have been more mundane in some ways. The movie likely added more exciting moments for entertainment. Also, the relationships between the dogs and their human counterparts might be more polished in the movie compared to what really happened.

Well, the true story probably had less extreme violence. The movie 'Hostel 2005' amps up the gore and horror elements to a great degree. In real - life, the situation might have been more about illegal activities in a more subdued way, not the over - the - top torture chambers shown in the movie.

The true story behind 'The Strangers' is based on real-life cases of home invasions and random acts of violence, but it's not a direct account of any specific incident.

One main difference is the level of action. The true story was likely more about the planning and execution of the heist, while the movie has over - the - top action like the Mini Cooper chase. Also, the characters in the movie are probably more stylized.

Well, the movie is much more graphic and violent. In the true story, the events might not have been as overly dramatized as in the movie. Also, the movie adds a lot of horror - movie - like elements to make it scarier for the audience, which might not have been part of the original true story.

One difference could be in the characters' backstories. The movie might have added more details or changed some aspects of their personal lives for dramatic effect. Also, the sequence of events during their survival in the mountains could be adjusted. In the true story, certain events might have happened in a different order compared to the movie. Another difference could be the way the relationship between the two main characters develops. The movie might have sped up or slowed down this process for the sake of the story's pacing.

The movie 'The Revenant' takes some liberties with the true story. In the real story, the relationships between characters might have been more complex and less black - and - white as portrayed in the movie. The movie might have focused more on the revenge aspect, while in the true story, Hugh Glass's survival was likely driven by more than just revenge. There could have been a greater variety of day - to - day survival challenges in the true story that the movie didn't fully capture, as it was more focused on creating a visually and emotionally engaging cinematic experience.

In the real story, there was no such over - the - top action as in the movie. The movie shows Rambo taking on huge numbers of enemies alone, which is a big exaggeration. Also, the real - life inspiration was more about the emotional and social struggles of veterans rather than just physical combat like in the movie.

Well, in the true story, the real elephant was just a large and well - known elephant. In Dumbo, the main character can fly with his ears. That's a huge difference. Also, the movie has a lot of made - up characters like the crows that befriend Dumbo. In the true story, there were no such magical or fictional elements. The movie focuses a lot on Dumbo's journey of self - discovery and acceptance, which may not have been part of the real elephant's story.