The use of data. Life care planning relies on a lot of data such as demographic data, health statistics, and cost - of - living data. This data is used to project future needs and costs. For example, insurance companies use actuarial tables based on real - world data to price long - term care insurance. This shows that it is a scientific process based on facts and figures.
The fact that it is based on established medical knowledge. Doctors and healthcare professionals have a good understanding of how diseases progress, how aging affects the body, and what kind of care is typically needed at different stages. Life care planners use this medical knowledge to anticipate future care requirements. For instance, if someone has a family history of a certain disease, they can plan for potential medical interventions and support, which is a scientific approach.
It's science. Life care planning involves practical aspects like financial planning for future medical needs, end - of - life care arrangements, and long - term care options. These are all based on real - world data, such as average life expectancies, costs of medical treatments, and the prevalence of certain age - related diseases. It's a way to be prepared for the future in a rational and methodical way, not something out of a fictional story.
Graphology seems like fiction because there's no real scientific proof. It's like saying a certain color of pen predicts your mood. It's just made - up ideas. But it might seem like science because it has some rules and patterns that people talk about. However, these are not based on facts.
The movie 'Sound of Freedom' seems like truth due to multiple factors. Firstly, the overall context of child trafficking is a very real and prevalent problem in today's society. The movie portrays the desperation of the victims and the ruthlessness of the traffickers in a way that is consistent with real - life accounts. Additionally, the movie has been associated with real - life anti - trafficking efforts and organizations. It has also received support from those who are actively involved in combating child trafficking, which indicates that it is likely based on truth rather than pure fiction.
Animal testing is science because it follows scientific methods. Researchers design experiments, control variables, and collect data from animals. For example, in drug development, they use animals to test the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of new drugs. This real - world experimentation and data collection are the hallmarks of science.
The fictional characters make 'Cutting for Stone' seem like fiction. They are created by the author's imagination, not real people.
The lack of a complete and viable Neanderthal genome is a major factor. Without it, we can't even begin to attempt cloning. Also, the technology for cloning complex organisms like humans or Neanderthals is still in its infancy and has many limitations.
It seems nonfiction because it details the real - life challenges that Salva Dut faced. The descriptions of the environment, the lack of water, and the perils of war are all based on real situations in Sudan. For instance, the long distances he had to walk to find water are real problems that people in that area deal with. So, it's not a made - up fictional story but a portrayal of a real struggle.
The lack of real - world corroboration is a big factor. There are no real - life accounts or evidence to back up the events in '7 days in hell'. Also, the nature of the events described often defies the laws of physics and human experience, which strongly indicates it's a fictional creation.
The characters and the plot. It has characters that are likely created by the author's imagination and a plot that seems too neatly crafted to be non - fiction.
A good science fiction story has solid scientific basis and logical reasoning. When the technology or concepts presented make sense and are somewhat feasible, it feels more real.