Modern literature is a vast and diverse field. Gay erotic hypnosis stories are not typically considered appropriate for general readership. They cross the line into sexual content that may make many readers uncomfortable. However, within the realm of adult or niche LGBT+ literature, there may be a more accepting attitude. But overall, in terms of general literary canons and standards, they are not really appropriate.
It depends. In mainstream literature, they are usually not considered appropriate as they contain sexual and potentially fetish - related content. But in certain sub - cultures or among groups that focus on LGBT+ erotica, they might be seen as a valid form of creative exploration. However, from a broader social and moral perspective, many would frown upon such explicit content being part of general literature.
In the realm of literature, we should promote works that celebrate the diversity of the gay community in a positive and respectful manner. Stories that are centered around 'erotic creampie' are not in line with the values of promoting healthy and inclusive literature for the gay community or for society as a whole.
No. Mainstream literature is aimed at a wide range of audiences including children, families, and general readers. 'Erotic hypnosis stories' with their sexual or sensual content are not suitable for such a broad and diverse audience.
In general, no. Modern literature often focuses on a variety of themes such as human relationships, social issues, and personal growth. Erotic making love stories, with their focus on sexual encounters, can be seen as going against the more 'polite' and inclusive nature of much modern literature. There are exceptions in some specific adult - only literary areas, but overall they are not considered appropriate for the broader literary landscape.
Definitely not. Appropriate literature should be suitable for a wide range of audiences and should not contain content that is overly sexual or lust - driven. 'Erotic lusty stories' are not in line with the standards of good literature.
No. Such stories often contain adult and inappropriate elements which go against moral and ethical standards in general literature.
In general, no. Literature should aim to enlighten, educate, or at least be suitable for a wide range of readers. 'Erotic hitchhiker stories' that involve sexual elements are not appropriate for most audiences. There are different genres in literature like classic literature, science fiction, mystery, etc. that are more acceptable and have positive contributions to the literary field, while 'erotic hitchhiker stories' are not in that category.
No. Erotic content in general is not considered appropriate for mainstream literature as it goes against many moral and ethical values.
Yes, they can be considered a form of literature. Just like any other genre that explores human relationships and sexuality, gay erotic stories can have literary value. They often delve into the emotional and physical aspects of gay relationships, using descriptive language to tell a story. However, they are also a niche genre and may not be widely accepted as mainstream literature due to their sexual nature.
It depends. In some ways, they can be. Erotic stories, if well - written, can explore human nature, relationships, and desires. However, they need to be presented in a tasteful and respectful way. If they are just for the sake of titillation without any deeper meaning, then they may not be appropriate. Also, different cultures and societies have different standards regarding this.
It is not appropriate. Writing or reading stories that involve drug use and erotic content, especially in a context that combines them with sexual orientation in an inappropriate way, goes against ethical and moral standards. It may also be illegal in many places as it can promote harmful and unethical behavior.