What does '2 sides of every story' imply?

It means there are always two viewpoints. The plaintiff might claim damages and present facts to support it. But the defendant will have their own narrative. They may argue that the plaintiff was also at fault or that there was a misunderstanding. Just like in a contract dispute, one side could say the terms were breached, while the other says they were following the contract as they understood it.

It means that in any situation or event, there are typically three different perspectives. For example, in a conflict between two people, there's the side of person A, the side of person B, and then there's an objective or outside view that might consider factors neither of them initially thought about.

It probably implies that there are many different perspectives or aspects to each story, not just one or two.

It usually means that for any story, there are three perspectives: the teller's, the listener's, and the objective truth that might be different from both.

It means that there's a unique style suitable for each individual story. Different stories have their own distinct characteristics, and a corresponding style is needed to bring out their best.

It means that in any situation or story, there are more than just two sides (like the common 'two sides to a story'). There's often a third perspective that might be overlooked, perhaps a neutral view or a view that combines elements of the other two.

Well, '2 sides to every story' implies that we should not be too quick to judge. Just like in a courtroom, the prosecution and the defense present different sides. One side might seem right at first, but when you hear the other side, things become more complex. So, it encourages us to look at all aspects before making a conclusion.

Well, it means that every story has more than just two sides. Usually we think of two sides like right and wrong, but there's often a third extreme side that might be unexpected or overlooked. For example, in a dispute between two neighbors, one side might seem right, the other wrong, but there could be a third aspect like an external factor affecting them both that changes the whole perspective.

Well, 'three sides to every story' implies that there's not just one way to view a situation. There's the perspective of the person involved, the perspective of the person observing, and a more balanced or objective view that takes into account different factors and viewpoints. It encourages us to think more deeply and consider all possible sides.

It implies that every story has multiple viewpoints. Say you have a dispute - the person who started it might see it one way, the person they were in the dispute with might see it differently, and then there could be a view from someone who wasn't directly involved but has an opinion based on what they saw or heard.