Historical biases are a big factor. English literature has its roots in a society with a lot of class and race divides. The upper classes were more likely to be literate and have the resources to write novels. So, their experiences and the experiences of those like them were more likely to be the focus. Also, the idea of what is 'universal' in literature has been skewed towards the experiences of the dominant groups. So, groups that don't fit into that dominant mold are rarely the protagonists in the English novel.
Stereotypes play a part in why certain groups are rarely the protagonists. There are often preconceived notions about what makes a 'good' or 'interesting' protagonist. For instance, the idea that a strong, male hero is the ideal protagonist has been prevalent for a long time. This has excluded groups like women, who were for a long time relegated to secondary roles. Also, lack of representation in the literary world itself means that there are fewer writers from certain groups who can tell their own stories as protagonists in English novels.
It could be because authors want to explore different perspectives and not focus solely on a single protagonist. Maybe they aim to show a broader picture of the story's world.
Children from poor families are rarely the protagonists in the English novel. English novels often tend to feature characters with more power or influence, or at least those with the potential for a grand adventure or transformation. Poor children may not be seen as having the same level of agency or the kind of story that would appeal to a wide readership. However, there are some works that break this mold, but they are not as common as novels with more 'conventional' protagonists.
It depends. Some comics can be too mature for young kids, but there are also ones suitable for all ages.
It depends. Some DC Comics content can be mature and might not be suitable for young kids, but for teenagers and adults, it can be fine depending on their preferences and maturity level.
There were many reasons why Capricorns rarely became female leads. Capricorn is a more down-to-earth, practical, and stable constellation. It is usually not good at expressing emotions or actively pursuing love. In novels, female protagonists usually need to have a distinct personality and outstanding emotional performance. Capricorns are more focused on career and self-actualization, which may make some novelists more inclined to choose female protagonists from other zodiacs. Capricorns are usually introverted, conservative, and not very good at expressing their feelings. As a result, they may have to face more emotional challenges and tests as the female lead in the novel, which may make some readers feel depressed and difficult to resonate with. Capricorn was regarded as a more practical and rational constellation in astrology. They paid more attention to reality and long-term planning and did not easily believe in romantic stories. Therefore, Capricorns may have to face more realistic challenges in the novel, which may disappoint and displease some readers. However, Capricorn is also a very talented and powerful constellation. They can add more value and meaning to the story if they perform well in their work. Therefore, it was not necessarily a bad thing to use Capricorn as the heroine in the novel. It depended on how the author portrayed and expressed the character.
This question involved some of the history and cultural traditions of detective novels and society's views on female characters. In the tradition of detective novels, men are usually seen as more courageous, adventurous, and detective characters, while women are expected to play more gentle, careful, and imaginative characters. This kind of gender prejudice affected the creation of detective novels to a certain extent, making it difficult for female characters to become protagonists in such novels. In some traditional detective novels, female characters were usually portrayed as vases, lacking real reasoning ability, and only focusing on appearance and image was difficult to attract readers 'interest. Although there have been some female detective novels, there are still relatively few female detective characters compared to male characters. This may be due to the expectations of society for female characters and the influence of literary tradition. Although this gender bias has been changed to some extent, the tradition of detective novels and expectations of the gender of the characters still exist, which also limits the development of female characters in this type of novel.
There are many different explanations for why Capricorns rarely become female leads. Here are some possible explanations: Capricorn is usually seen as a more serious and conservative constellation. They are usually not very good at expressing emotions and have difficulty adapting to complex interpersonal relationships. Therefore, Capricorns were often seen as calm, rational, and reliable characters in novels rather than the heroine who was full of emotions and adventurous spirit. Capricorns usually pay attention to their career and money. They usually devote more time and energy to their work and career. Therefore, in the novel, Capricorn characters may represent the image of professional women more than romantic and emotional characters. Capricorns are usually considered to be practical and reliable. They focus on practical actions and plans rather than verbal rhetoric and promises. Capricorn characters were often described as overly conservative and cautious in novels, lacking in the spirit of adventure. The above are just some possible explanations. In fact, the reason why Capricorn became the female lead may vary according to the type of novel, the plot, and the author's writing style.
Among certain sub - cultures, fictional occult books are quite popular. These might include groups interested in gothic culture or those who are into role - playing games that have elements of the occult. The allure of these books lies in their ability to create a sense of mystery and intrigue that normal fiction may not provide.
The protagonists are often in their teens because that's the age when a lot of life - changing events happen. It's a time of great upheaval and growth, which makes for exciting stories.
There were many possible answers to this question because the plot and character settings of the novel were freely developed by the author. The following are some possible reasons: 1. The male lead could be a bad guy. The author might want the male protagonist to do something shameless because he wanted to show the male protagonist's personality and characteristics. The male lead might have been framed or forced to do something that made him very shameless. He might feel that he was being used or that he was innocent, but in the end, he was forced to do something immoral. 3. The male protagonist's shameless behavior may be because he has some internal motives. He might think that doing so would give him a sense of satisfaction or accomplishment, or he might think that it was a response to someone or something he liked. The shameless behavior of the male protagonist may be because he was forced to grow up. He may be forced to walk the path of shamelessness because of some unfortunate things, but he may eventually get out of this predicament through growth and change. The reason why the male protagonist in the novel was particularly shameless depended on the author's setting and plot arrangement.