Are photos of real ghost stories reliable evidence of the existence of ghosts?

It's hard to say they are reliable. While some past life evidence stories seem very convincing, there is no scientific method that can fully prove that they are real accounts of past lives. There are often alternative explanations such as psychological factors or coincidence. For example, a person might seem to recall a past life event but it could be a result of a vivid dream influenced by something they experienced in their current life.

There was no conclusive evidence to prove that the Ghost Cave Tribe really existed in history. However, for some web novels, it depended on their inspiration and purpose. Creating fictional races and characters in literature can bring many benefits, such as increasing the complexity of the plot, exploring cultural and social backgrounds, and so on. Although fictional races like the Ghost Cave Tribe could not be completely the same as the real world, they could bring new experiences and feelings to the readers. It should be noted that fictional characters and plots in literature should be distinguished from the real world and should not be regarded as real entities. Therefore, we should not believe in any race or character described in literature, but should judge whether they really exist based on facts and evidence.

No. Most real ghost pictures can be easily explained away. It could be a trick of the light, a problem with the camera equipment, or just a random object that looks spooky in the photo. And as for stories, people tend to exaggerate or misinterpret things when they are scared or in a strange place.

Not really. Most of the online real ghost stories are just for entertainment. People might exaggerate or even make up parts of their stories. There's no scientific proof to back up the claims in these stories.

Well, it depends. Some real accounts of ghost stories might be the result of overactive imaginations. People could misinterpret normal events as something supernatural. For example, a strange noise at night could be just the old house settling, but in a ghost story, it becomes a sign of a spirit. So, not all of them are reliable.

Not really. Most of these stories are based on hearsay and superstition. People might misinterpret normal sounds or sights as something paranormal. For example, an old house creaking could be just the wood settling, but in a ghost story, it becomes a spirit making its presence known.

Hardly. Think about it. A lot of these 'ghost pictures' can be easily explained. For instance, a long exposure on a camera can create a blurry, apparition - like image. And as for the stories, they are usually based on people's emotions and fears. People might see something strange in an old, spooky - looking house and then create a whole ghost story out of it. There's rarely any scientific evidence to back up these pictures and stories.

Not really. Most of the time, what people perceive as ghostly experiences can be explained by natural phenomena. For example, strange noises could be due to old plumbing or creaky floors.

No, fiction is not a reliable type of evidence. It's made-up stories and not based on real facts or events.

I think ghost existence stories are mainly fictional. However, some people claim to have had experiences that they believe are related to ghosts. But these could be due to psychological factors such as stress, sleep paralysis, or just overactive imaginations. For example, in a spooky old building at night, our minds might play tricks on us and make us think we see something that isn't there. Without scientific evidence, it's hard to believe that ghosts are real.