Rtj could be a person's initials or a nickname. Maybe they would beat someone to a pulp if they were in a really angry situation, like if they were being attacked or if someone had seriously wronged them. But without more context, it's hard to say for sure.
Well, 'rtj' is quite a mystery here. The phrase 'beat em to a pulp no fiction' sounds very aggressive. It could be that rtj is part of some sort of a rough crowd or a person with a lot of pent - up anger. Maybe in their world, violence is seen as a way to solve problems. However, it could also be a bluff and rtj might not actually be as violent as the statement makes them seem. There could be a backstory where they have been pushed to the limit and this is their way of expressing their frustration or a warning to others not to mess with them.
It means rtj is threatening to severely beat someone up. 'No fiction' might imply that it's not just talk, but a real intention.
It's probably a misunderstanding. Maybe someone is not familiar with the distinct styles and reputations of the two entities. Disney is so well - known for its family - friendly fare, and Pulp Fiction is so far from that, that it's a very odd association.
It could be due to misinformation. Disney is such a large media conglomerate that people might wrongly assume it owns everything. However, Pulp Fiction is far from Disney's usual family - friendly fare. It's a Quentin Tarantino creation with a very different style and target audience compared to Disney's offerings.
Well, it might be that this person has a very warped view of the world. They could be lumping dogs together with something they consider 'filthy' in the context of a type of writing like 'pulp fiction' perhaps because they see dogs as common or unrefined in some strange way. But it's really not a fair or accurate view of dogs at all.
Perhaps they are really into the style and themes of 'Pulp Fiction' and see a relationship or connection in it that they feel strongly about, so they express it this way.
Maybe they love the movie so much that they want to hear again whatever was said about it. For instance, if it was a trivia fact.
It could be that there was a business deal or a creative collaboration related to 'Pulp Fiction'. But in hindsight, it turned out to be a bad idea. So the person is saying that from the start, one should have said no. Like if it involved investing in a 'Pulp Fiction' - themed product that ended up failing in the market.
Perhaps it was a baseless attempt at creating shock value. Anderson Cooper is respected in the field of journalism for his work in reporting news. The 'gimp' from Pulp Fiction is a character in a Quentin Tarantino movie that is quite different in nature. Comparing the two is like comparing apples and oranges, but some people might do it just to be edgy or get attention without any real thought behind it.
Well, if Langedorf watched 'Pulp Fiction', his/her thoughts could vary greatly. If he/she is into movies with a lot of dialogue and complex characters, like the ones in 'Pulp Fiction', then he/she might appreciate it. However, if Langedorf prefers more straightforward, action - based movies, he/she might not be as fond of it. The movie's unique style, with its intertwined storylines and off - beat humor, is not for everyone. So it really depends on Langedorf's personal taste in movies.
It could be because 'Pulp Fiction' is a very influential piece of work. It has influenced a lot of other movies and books in terms of style, story - telling and character development. So the person saying this might believe that everyone can learn from it or enjoy its unique qualities.