What are the main reasons to think Atlantis is real or fiction?

Atlantis is most likely a fiction. There is no conclusive archaeological evidence to prove its existence. Although many theories and speculations exist, such as the idea that it was a highly advanced civilization that sank beneath the ocean, these remain unproven. Most of the stories about Atlantis come from ancient Greek philosopher Plato's descriptions, which could be more of a moral or philosophical allegory rather than a historical account.

There is also the theory that Atlantis was destroyed by a cataclysmic event. In the story of 'Atlantis: The Lost Empire', there is a sense of a great disaster that led to its downfall. In real - world theories, this could have been a massive earthquake, a huge tsunami, or a volcanic eruption. The lack of historical records from that era makes it difficult to prove, but these theories persist because they seem to fit with the idea of a once - great civilization disappearing suddenly.

The Atlantis real story is likely a blend of fact and fiction. Plato was a philosopher, and he might have used the idea of Atlantis to convey certain philosophical or moral ideas. However, the descriptions he gave of its advanced technology and grandeur could potentially be based on some real, but now lost, ancient civilization. There have been many attempts to find Atlantis, but without success so far, which makes it difficult to determine whether it was real or just a fictional creation.

Atlantis is a legendary lost city. Some believe it was a highly advanced civilization that was destroyed by a great flood or some cataclysmic event. However, there is no conclusive scientific proof of its existence yet.

The real story of Atlantis is quite elusive. Plato's account gives us some details like it was a wealthy island nation with a strong military. There are those who believe that Atlantis was a sort of exaggerated or mythologized version of a real Bronze Age civilization. It might have been influenced by the Minoan civilization, which had a significant presence in the Aegean Sea around that time. However, the lack of definitive evidence means that Atlantis continues to be a fascinating enigma, with many different interpretations and theories floating around in the academic and non - academic worlds alike.

The main reason to think Robin Hood is fictional is the lack of solid historical proof. There are no official documents from that time period that mention a 'Robin Hood'. However, some think he could be real because there were often outlaws during the medieval times in England, and the concept of stealing from the rich to give to the poor was not unheard of. So it's possible that the legend was based on a real - life figure or figures, but still, without evidence, it's mostly considered fictional.

Atlantis is more of a fictional concept. It's often found in myths and legends, but no solid historical or archaeological proof suggests it was real. Many believe it was created as a story to convey certain ideas or morals.

Atlantis isn't real. It's a concept that emerged in ancient writings but lacks concrete proof. It might have been used as a metaphor or a fictional setting to convey certain ideas rather than representing an actual location.

Many sightings are unreliable. People could mistake other things for the monster, like waves or debris. Also, the loch has been studied and no signs of a large, unknown creature have been found.

Antarctica is a well - monitored area for scientific purposes. Scientists study everything from the ice cores to the wildlife. If there was a 'UFO war', it would disrupt the natural order and leave behind obvious traces that would be detected during these studies. Since no such disruptions or traces have been found, it's reasonable to conclude it's a fictional idea. Also, the stories about it often lack specific details and are more like unfounded rumors.