What did The New York Times review about a ghost story?

Well, generally, the NYT review of 'A Ghost Story' could be centered around its artistic merit. It could have praised the film for its minimalist approach. The use of long, static shots to build tension and a feeling of melancholy might have been commended. The movie's exploration of time, loss, and love in a very subdued and thought - provoking manner could also be a key part of the review. Maybe they also compared it to other films in the genre, highlighting what makes 'A Ghost Story' unique.

I don't know the exact rating. It could be positive if they liked the unique storytelling and the mood it created.

I'm not entirely sure as I haven't read it specifically. But generally, a ghost story in the New York Times might be about some spooky encounters, haunted places in New York, or perhaps the experiences of people who claim to have seen ghosts in the city.

I'm not sure of the exact review but generally, it might have praised the music. 'West Side Story' has an iconic score. If the New York Times review focused on that, it could have said how the music added to the drama and emotion of the story.

The New York Times review of 'Marriage Story' may have focused on several aspects. Firstly, it could have talked about how the movie delved deep into the characters' psyches. The lead actors' portrayals were so nuanced that it made the story feel very real. Secondly, the review might have mentioned the film's pacing. It didn't seem rushed, allowing the audience to fully experience each stage of the marriage's dissolution. Additionally, the movie's use of dialogue was probably praised. The conversations between the characters were so raw and honest, which added to the overall authenticity of the story. It's a movie that doesn't shy away from showing the ugly as well as the beautiful parts of a relationship, and the review may have highlighted this aspect as well.

The New York Times often has in - depth reviews of historical fiction. These reviews can be a great resource for readers. They might discuss how well the author has re - created a particular historical period, whether the characters seem believable within that context, and the overall quality of the writing. For example, a review might praise a book for its meticulous research into a little - known historical event and how it weaves that into an engaging story.

Some reviews in The New York Times might praise the authenticity of the Antebellum South novels. They could note how well the authors captured the essence of the southern culture, like the genteel manners of the upper class. For instance, if a novel accurately described the elaborate balls and social events in the Antebellum South, the NYT might commend it for its historical accuracy.

The 'New York Times A New York Love Story' could be about various aspects. It might be a story of two people who meet because of an article in the New York Times. Maybe one is a writer for the paper and the other is someone who was interviewed. Their relationship then blossoms against the backdrop of New York City. Or it could be a story that uses the New York Times as a symbol of the city, and the love story is intertwined with the culture and lifestyle that the newspaper represents. It could also be a historical love story where the New York Times played a role in the events that led to the couple getting together.

One key point could be the portrayal of the complex relationship between the two main characters. The review might mention how the film delved deep into the emotional rollercoaster of a marriage falling apart.

The review in The New York Times may discuss the acting performances in Marriage Story. The actors might be praised for their ability to convey complex emotions such as love, anger, and sadness during the divorce process. Their on - screen chemistry, even in the midst of a relationship falling apart, could be a significant aspect of the review.