Consider the reputation of the source. Well - established and respected news organizations have a track record of fact - checking. On the other hand, sources that are known for spreading misinformation or have a strong bias are more likely to present fiction as truth.
One way is to research historical records. If there are primary sources about the duel, like official documents or eyewitness accounts, they can point to the truth. Fiction, on the other hand, often has elements that are too dramatic or not in line with the known historical context.
Look at the evidence provided. Truthful statements usually come with evidence like data, photos, or eyewitness accounts. For instance, if a news story claims a scientific discovery but doesn't show any research data or quotes from scientists involved, it could be partly fiction. Also, consider the motivation of the source. If a source has a financial or political gain from spreading a certain story, it may mix truth and fiction to serve their own ends.
One way to distinguish is by looking at official documents. For example, court records in the case of Facebook's founding. If the movie 'The Social Network' shows something that contradicts these official sources, it's likely fiction. Also, interviews with the real people involved can be a great source. If they say that certain events in the movie didn't happen as portrayed, that's a sign of fiction.
One way is to look at the details. In truth, events usually have a logical sequence. For example, if a story claims someone was in two places at once in a 'true' account of a 'Friend of the Family' situation, it's likely fiction. Real events also tend to have witnesses whose accounts match. If the stories vary greatly among supposed witnesses, it may be more fiction than truth.
One way is to check the source. Reputable news organizations are more likely to report facts. For example, well - known international news agencies usually have strict fact - checking procedures. Another way is to look for evidence. If a news story makes a claim, but there is no evidence provided, it might be more likely to be fiction. Also, cross - reference with other reliable sources. If multiple reliable sources report the same thing, it's more likely to be a fact.
Look for evidence. Truth usually has some form of evidence to back it up, whether it's physical evidence, eyewitness accounts, or data. Fiction often lacks such solid support. For instance, in a historical study, we can find artifacts as evidence.
One way is to look at reliable sources like biographies written by reputable authors. They usually do a lot of research.
One can start by reading reliable historical books about Hamilton. These will give the accurate facts. Then, compare it with fictional works like the musical or novels about him.
Well, in 'the burial truth vs fiction', you can tell by the details. Truth about burial usually has specific details related to the location, like the type of soil in a cemetery that affects burial methods. It also has details about the people involved, like the mourners and the clergy. Fiction, however, might go overboard with details that are not realistic. For example, a story about a burial where the body is sent to a different dimension. Also, truth is often consistent across different real - world sources, while fiction can vary widely depending on the author's imagination.
One way is to compare the show with real - life news reports about Theranos. If something seems too outlandish in the show, it might be fiction.