How does The New York Times review historical fictions in general?

They probably look at the popularity of the book among readers. If a lot of people are talking about a particular novel, it might catch their attention.

The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.

The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.

Well, one characteristic is often high - quality writing. These historical fictions usually have well - developed characters. For example, in many of them, the characters are complex and multi - dimensional, just like in 'The Goldfinch'. The plot is also engaging, often drawing on real historical events in a creative way to make the story more interesting and relatable.

The review may point out that the actors' chemistry is palpable. They are able to show the love that once was between the characters as well as the growing animosity during the divorce process. Their ability to switch between different emotions seamlessly is a key factor in the movie's success.

Then there is 'The Underground Railroad' which got significant attention from The New York Times. It uses a unique concept of a literal underground railroad to explore the harrowing experience of slaves in America. The NYT review probably emphasized its power to make readers confront the brutal history of slavery.

The review might say the acting in 'Marriage Story' is superb. The actors likely brought the characters to life in a very believable way.

Maybe the review in the New York Times praised the actors for their ability to convey the intense emotions in West Side Story. Their performances in the love scenes and the fight scenes could have been highlighted.

The New York Times likely considers factors such as the quality of the art. If the illustrations are unique, detailed, and enhance the story, it's more likely to be noticed. For example, in a graphic novel like 'Fun Home', the detailed and evocative drawings play a huge role in bringing the story to life.

Sure. 'All the Light We Cannot See' is a great historical fiction that might have been on the New York Times list. It's set during World War II and tells a beautiful and poignant story of a blind French girl and a German boy. Their lives intersect in unexpected ways, and the novel does an excellent job of portraying the era.