Well, it depends. There are rules of evidence that govern what a jury can and cannot hear. Sometimes, issues of confidentiality or protection of witnesses might lead to parts of the story being withheld. For instance, if a witness is in a witness protection program and revealing certain details could endanger their life or the integrity of the program, those details might not be presented to the jury. So, while the goal is often to present a full and accurate account to the jury, there are circumstances where they can be stopped from hearing the 'full story'.
No. The jury should hear the full story to make a fair and just decision. All relevant evidence and information should be presented to them.
Yes, in some cases. For example, if the evidence is deemed inadmissible due to legal technicalities such as improper collection or violation of the defendant's rights. The judge has the authority to prevent the jury from hearing certain parts of the story. This is to ensure a fair trial based on proper legal procedures.
Well, it's possible. For instance, if the information is considered irrelevant, prejudicial, or obtained illegally, it could be kept from the jury to maintain the integrity of the trial process.
Yes. In a fair trial, the jury should hear the full story. This allows them to make a well - informed and just decision. If they only hear parts of the story, there is a high risk of reaching a wrong verdict based on incomplete information.
In 'A Jury of Her Peers', the story focuses on the murder investigation. The female characters, Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters, play a crucial role. They understand the accused woman's situation better than the male investigators. Their insights are based on their own experiences as women in a male - dominated society.
No. Curses are not real in a scientific sense. A story is just a narrative, and while it might be spooky or disturbing, it doesn't have the power to place a curse on you.
I don't think so. It's just a superstition and has no real basis.
Yes. In a civil case, just like in a criminal one, the jury needs to hear the full story. This helps them decide which party is at fault or liable. If they don't get the full account, they might wrongly assign blame or damages.
One main theme is gender inequality. The men in the story dominate the investigation and underestimate the women. Another theme is justice. The women, through their own form of 'jury', seek a different kind of justice for the accused woman.
It's possible. For example, if the prosecution or defense wants to keep certain information confidential for strategic reasons and can convince the judge that it's necessary, the jury may be prevented from learning those details. However, this has to be balanced with the need for a fair trial.