In an online story, a reliable eyewitness account can be the best proof. Let's say it's a story about a community event. If someone who was actually there and has a good reputation in the community shares their experience in detail, it gives credibility to the story. Eyewitness accounts can often fill in the details and emotions that other forms of proof might miss.
Well, the best proof in an online story could be a clear photo or video that directly supports the main event or claim in the story. For example, if the story is about a rare animal sighting, a photo of that animal taken at the location mentioned in the story would be great proof.
One way is to look for sources within the story. If it's a news - type online story, check for quotes from experts or people directly involved. For example, if it's a story about a scientific discovery, quotes from the scientists themselves are good proof.
I think it suggests that the writer has faith in the reader's ability to figure things out. They don't feel the need to over - explain. Let's say in a philosophical story, the author might present different situations and characters, but leave it up to the reader to see how those elements prove a certain idea. It's like the writer is saying, 'I've set the stage, now you, the reader, find the proof within the story'.
A story like 'The Catcher in the Rye' is also a good example. Salinger doesn't explicitly state Holden's psychological state. Instead, through Holden's ramblings, his encounters with different people, and his views on the world, the reader has to figure out his inner turmoil. The best proof of Holden's state of mind is left for the reader to deduce from his actions and words in the story.
In most cases, 'Burden of Proof' isn't a true story. It might draw inspiration from real-life situations but is mainly fabricated to engage the audience and tell a compelling tale.
No, it's not. 'Proof of Life' is a fictional story created for entertainment purposes.
It's hard to say for sure. Some people believe it's true based on personal experiences, while others are skeptical.
One real - story aspect is the car - centric nature. Cars play a huge role in real - life cultures, and in 'Death Proof' they are central to the plot. The idea of a car being 'death proof' is a play on the real - life modifications and the myths that surround certain cars in enthusiast communities.
The idea of a 'death - proof' vehicle in 'Death Proof' has some basis in real - life automotive experiments and stunts. Also, the concept of a deranged person using a car in a malicious way is related to real - world stories of road rage and criminal use of vehicles. In the movie, Stuntman Mike's actions with his car can be seen as an extreme version of these real - life events. Tarantino took these elements and combined them with his own creative vision to make the movie both thrilling and thought - provoking.
The 'proof of life' true story typically involves situations where evidence of a person being alive is crucial. For example, in hostage situations, a proof of life can be a video or a message from the hostage to show that they are still alive. It could also be related to missing persons cases, where any sign or communication indicating the person is alive serves as proof of life.
Well, the idea of a dangerous and seemingly invincible car like in 'Death Proof' could potentially be based on true tales of reckless driving or modified cars that were used in not - so - legal activities. However, Tarantino likely added a lot of his own fictional elements such as the characters' backstories, the specific stunts, and the dialogue. So while the overall idea of a death - proof car could have a true - story origin, much of the movie's content is Tarantino's creative addition.