Sure, 'gay erotica' is a legitimate form of literature. It has the power to tell stories that are important for the gay community. It can depict the nuances of gay relationships, from the initial attraction to the deeper emotional bonds. At the same time, it needs to be handled with care, ensuring that it doesn't promote harmful stereotypes or non - consensual behavior, but when done right, it is a valid part of the literary landscape.
No. Erotica involving youth is not legitimate as it violates ethical and moral boundaries, especially when it comes to protecting minors from exploitation.
It's a bit of a grey area. While some might argue that as a form of fan - created work it has a place in the realm of creative expression, others might say that due to its often sexual nature it's not really 'legitimate' literature. It depends on how one defines literature. If we consider any form of written creative work as literature, then in a sense it could be, but traditional views might not consider it so because of the erotic content.
It's a matter of debate. Some people might consider medical erotica short stories as a form of literature because they can tell a story with characters, a plot, and a theme. However, others might object due to the often - blurry ethical lines they cross, especially when it comes to doctor - patient relationships or other professional medical scenarios.
No. Gay erotica stories are mainly focused on sexual content and are not in the realm of traditional literature which typically emphasizes on themes like human nature, society, emotions etc. in a more profound and non - sexual way.
No. Erotic stories often contain inappropriate sexual content, which goes against moral and ethical norms in general literature. Most literary works are expected to convey positive values, emotions, and ideas, rather than focusing on sexual allure.
No. Literature that focuses mainly on sexual content in an improper way is not considered legitimate. True literature should have deeper themes, such as human nature, society, and moral exploration.
No. Firstly, if 'amazoin' is a misspelling, and regardless of that, 'sex fanfic' that involves inappropriate and often non - consensual or unethical scenarios is not considered legitimate literature. Legitimate literature usually adheres to certain moral, ethical, and literary standards.
Yes, in a sense. They can be considered a form of literature as they tell stories, often of relationships and human desires. However, they are often not as highly regarded as other more 'high - brow' forms of literature because of their focus on sexual content.
No. Given that it involves the Wii, which is a family - friendly gaming brand, and 'erotic' which implies sexual content, it goes against the values of proper literature. Legitimate literature usually adheres to certain moral and ethical standards, and this combination seems to violate those.
Probably not in a traditional sense. While it might contain some elements related to Hollywood history, the 'erotica' aspect makes it more of a niche or even potentially a fictionalized collection. Historical documentation usually focuses on more objective facts and broader cultural, social, and economic aspects of a place or industry.