The literary quality also matters. Novels with strong writing, unique storytelling, and well - developed characters are more likely to be considered. For example, books with beautiful prose or innovative narrative structures.
They probably look at the popularity of the book among readers. If a lot of people are talking about a particular novel, it might catch their attention.
The New York Times likely considers factors such as the quality of the art. If the illustrations are unique, detailed, and enhance the story, it's more likely to be noticed. For example, in a graphic novel like 'Fun Home', the detailed and evocative drawings play a huge role in bringing the story to life.
They probably look for stories that are relevant to the current affairs in New York. For instance, if there's a new policy regarding housing in the city, they might cover the impact on the residents through real - life stories.
Popularity among readers also matters. High sales figures and a large following on platforms like Goodreads or in book clubs can contribute to a graphic novel being noticed by the New York Times. They might also look at the innovation in the art style and the narrative. A unique way of telling a story or an original art style can set a graphic novel apart and make it eligible for their list.
The New York Times likely reviews Japanese novels based on various aspects. For example, they might consider the originality of the story. If a novel presents a unique concept or a fresh take on a common theme, it would be noted. For instance, a Japanese novel that combines traditional Japanese cultural elements with modern storytelling techniques might get a positive review.
I'm not entirely sure, but probably they look at the popularity of the author. If an author has a big following in the romance genre, they might be more likely to be reviewed. Also, new and upcoming trends in romance might catch their eye.
The New York Times often provides in-depth and critical reviews of Trump stories, focusing on various aspects such as policy, actions, and statements.
The NYT reviews often focus on the historical accuracy of the work. If the story is set in a particular era, they check if the details like clothing, language, and social norms are correct.
The review may point out that the actors' chemistry is palpable. They are able to show the love that once was between the characters as well as the growing animosity during the divorce process. Their ability to switch between different emotions seamlessly is a key factor in the movie's success.
The review might say the acting in 'Marriage Story' is superb. The actors likely brought the characters to life in a very believable way.
Maybe the review in the New York Times praised the actors for their ability to convey the intense emotions in West Side Story. Their performances in the love scenes and the fight scenes could have been highlighted.