Why would someone think Naruto sells insert fanfiction?

The answer is no. Naruto as a fictional character doesn't engage in selling fanfiction. Fanfiction is a form of fan - created content that exists outside the official commercial activities of the Naruto franchise. The official Naruto products are focused on things like the original story in manga and anime form, along with related toys, clothing, and other merchandise.

Some people might think 'naruto is huge fanfiction' because of the large amount of fan - created content. There are so many Naruto fanfictions out there that it could seem like the whole Naruto concept is based on fan - made stories. Also, the complexity and the many different interpretations of the Naruto world in fanfictions might give this wrong impression.

It's a very strange thought. Maybe they are just misinformed or haven't really read either series properly. There's no real similarity between the two that would lead to such a conclusion.

I can't really think of a good reason why someone would think that. Maybe they misread some aspect of the story? But as I said before, the story is all about Greek mythology and Percy's adventures as a demigod, not security.

Some people might think so if they only focus on certain parts, like the dark magic used by the villains or the dangerous situations Harry and his friends get into. However, the series as a whole is not about promoting dark things. It's about the fight against the dark, and the positive values of friendship, loyalty, and courage that the characters display. So, it's a wrong view to consider it dark fanfiction.

Maybe they're just really confused. The two have almost nothing in common, but perhaps they saw some fan - made crossover art or something and got the wrong idea.

Maybe it's a misunderstanding. Some people might be confused if they've seen some crossover fan art or fan theories that mashed the two together in a really strange way. But in reality, they have no real connection in their original concepts.

It could be that they haven't really delved deep into either story. They might be making a hasty comparison because both 'Harry Potter' and 'Dracula' are part of the fantasy genre. However, when you look closely, 'Harry Potter' is about a boy wizard in a school learning magic, while 'Dracula' is about a vampire preying on humans. The storylines are completely different. Also, the magic in 'Harry Potter' is more structured and related to spells and potions, whereas in 'Dracula' it's more about the supernatural powers of the vampire. So, it's really a baseless thought.

Probably they are just very confused. Maybe they don't really understand the fundamental concepts of either Harry Potter or Archer. Harry Potter is full of magic and wizardry, while Archer is something else entirely.

Well, it could be that they are new to the world of both Harry Potter and the source of Kakuzu. And without proper knowledge, they might assume that since both involve elements of the supernatural or magic in some way, that there is a connection. However, as we know, Harry Potter has its own rich tapestry of magic, such as the magic taught at Hogwarts, the magic of the wizarding families, and the dark magic associated with Voldemort. And Kakuzu comes from a completely different context with its own set of rules and characteristics. So it's just a case of misinformation or lack of in - depth understanding.