Who is the author of the 'A Fate Worse Than Death 1901 Novel'?

I'm not sure specifically as there could be many novels with such a title. It might be about a character facing a situation that they consider to be extremely dire, perhaps a moral or social situation that is so bad it's seen as worse than death.

I'm not sure exactly. Maybe it's a tale of intense drama and hardship.

It could be seen that " Lanke Chess Fate " received some negative comments in the later development of the novel. Some comments pointed out that the plot of the novel had become abrupt, and the protagonist's behavior and explanation of knowledge points were unreasonable, causing readers to be confused. There were also people who felt that some of the characters and plots in the early stages were not fully developed, and that the style of the novel had changed significantly in the later chapters, perhaps because of the change of author. In addition, there were also people who mentioned that the use of golden fingers in the novel was too excessive, which was unacceptable to the readers. All in all, these negative comments might be the reason why " Lanke Chess " was getting worse and worse.

The reason why Lanke Chess was getting uglier and uglier was probably because the development of the story had become monotonous and dull, without any passion or novelty. Some readers thought that this book was suitable for catching up on updates, rather than reading it in one go. In addition, some people also mentioned that some chess pieces did not play much of a role and that the ending was not perfect. However, in general, the plot design of the book was compact, the characters were deeply portrayed, and the author also gave some unexpected endings. Therefore, there might be different opinions and evaluations on why Lanke's fate was getting worse.

Wish you could die at this moment and be moved from place to place like a vagrant

In many ways, novel coronavirus has presented greater challenges than SARS. It spreads more easily and has affected a much larger number of people. However, the severity can vary depending on individual cases and healthcare responses in different regions.

The novel coronavirus is typically considered worse. It spreads more easily, causes more severe illness in some cases, and has put a greater strain on healthcare systems compared to the flu.

In some aspects, yes. The novel coronavirus has spread more widely and affected a larger number of people globally compared to SARS.

The novel coronavirus is generally considered worse than flu. It has a higher rate of severe illness and complications, and its impact on healthcare systems has been much more significant.

Definitely. The novel coronavirus has had a much greater impact than the flu. It's more challenging to control, and its effects on global economies and healthcare systems have been far more profound.