It could imply that the core elements of storytelling remain constant. Emotions like fear, hope, and joy are always there to be explored in stories. Writers draw on these same emotions and the same basic plot devices. So, in essence, no matter how modern or innovative a story seems, it has roots in the stories that came before it. There is a limited set of things that can happen in a story, and we keep recycling and remixing those elements.
In modern literature, many authors play with existing story structures. They might put a new spin on a classic fairy - tale or a well - known historical event. This is in line with Foster's idea as they are not creating something completely new but building on what already exists. The basic building blocks of the story, like character types (the hero, the villain) and plot types (the quest, the mystery) are recycled in modern works.
I'm not entirely sure as I haven't read it specifically. But generally, it might be about a single overarching narrative that ties together various elements, perhaps characters, events, or themes.
The foster child may face challenges related to trust. It takes time to trust new people, especially when they have been through the upheaval of being placed in a new home. They may also face challenges in terms of identity. In a new home, they might be expected to conform to a certain family culture which could be different from their own. This can make them feel a bit lost as they try to figure out who they are within this new family dynamic.
It may approach it by looking for commonalities among different works. It could analyze how various stories use similar literary devices or themes.
The main idea is likely about how all stories are interconnected in some way. Foster probably argues that there is an overarching 'big story' that encompasses all individual tales, perhaps through common themes, motifs, or character archetypes.
Honestly, 'new story new cucumber' is a pretty odd phrase. Maybe it's some sort of creative or coded language, but without more context, it's hard to tell.
Well, it's difficult to say precisely who Thomas E Foster is in connection to 'One Big Story' without having read the work. However, he could be a key figure in exploring the theory behind this 'One Big Story'. He might have spent time researching and identifying the common threads that run through various stories. He could be someone who has a passion for seeing the bigger picture in literature and has decided to name this overarching concept 'One Big Story'. It's possible that he has used examples from classic and contemporary literature to support his ideas about this all - encompassing story.
It simply means a completely new or different account or narrative. For example, if you start a new project at work that has a different approach from previous ones, it's a whole new story.
It could mean that there are no fresh or newly created stories with elements of magic. Maybe in a particular context, like a story - telling community, they've run out of new magical tales to share.
It means a new or unexpected development in the story. For example, in a detective story, a new piece of evidence that changes the direction of the investigation is 'a new wrinkle in the story'.