It's fact. Consider a political debate. A politician might play for time to avoid answering a tough question directly. They could start rambling about related but not entirely relevant topics, just to use up time so they don't have to give a clear answer right away. This shows that 'playing for time' is a practical and often - used tactic.
It's fact. In a military context, when outnumbered or in a difficult position, a unit might play for time. They could set up false defenses or send out small skirmishes to slow down the enemy's advance while waiting for reinforcements. This clearly demonstrates that 'playing for time' is not a fictional concept but a real - world strategy.
It can be fact. In many situations, like in a negotiation or a sports game when a team is losing near the end, they might play for time. For example, in a business negotiation, a party might stall by asking for more details or taking long breaks to gain an advantage. So, it's a real strategy that exists in various fields.
It's fact. 'Playing for time' means deliberately using delaying tactics. For instance, in a legal case, a lawyer might use various procedures to postpone the trial if they think their side will benefit from more preparation time. It's a recognized strategy in many aspects of life.
It depends on what 'winning time' specifically refers to. If it's about a sports event, the winning time is a fact. For example, in a 100 - meter race, the time recorded for the winner is an actual measurement. However, if it's in a fictional story like a made - up race in a fantasy novel, then it would be fiction.
Fiction. As of now, there's no scientific evidence to support the existence of time travel. While theories like Einstein's relativity suggest the possibility of time dilation, which is a different concept from the kind of time travel we see in movies. We can't just hop into a machine and go back to the dinosaurs or forward to the future at will.
Fiction. As of now, there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of a time machine. Time travel remains a concept mostly explored in science fiction, like in the famous 'Back to the Future' movies.
By looking at the lore.
Fact. Many elements in the movie are based on real events and people in Hollywood's history. For example, the setting of 1969 Hollywood is real, and some of the characters are inspired by real-life individuals like Sharon Tate. However, the movie also takes creative liberties and fictionalizes certain aspects to create a more engaging story.
If there are objective measurements involved, it's a fact. For example, in a swim meet, the timekeepers use stopwatches to record the exact time it takes for a swimmer to finish a race. That's a fact - based winning time. But if it's a story someone made up like 'I had a winning time in my imaginary race against superheroes', that's fiction.
Fiction. Modern science has not been able to prove that time travel is possible. Scientists have explored concepts like time dilation, but this is not the same as actual time travel. Time dilation occurs in situations like when an object is moving at a high speed relative to another, but it doesn't allow for traveling to different historical or future periods in the way we imagine time travel.
It's fiction for now. There's no scientific evidence to prove time travel is possible currently. While some theories in physics like Einstein's relativity touch on time dilation, which can make time seem to pass differently in certain conditions, actual traveling back and forth in time remains in the realm of science fiction.
It's a complex question. Time Magazine might present different viewpoints on this. Some might consider parts of the Bible as based on historical events and religious teachings, while others might view certain elements as more symbolic or metaphorical.