No. I would use quotation marks for a short story's name and italics for a book - length story in a bibliography. Underlining seems a bit archaic for this purpose and may not be in line with modern bibliographic formatting standards.
No. In a bibliography, the name of a short story is usually written in italics. This is a standard formatting style to make it clear that it is a title of a work. Underlining is not typically used in bibliographies for short stories.
Yes, typically in written work, the name of a short story is underlined. This is a common convention in handwritten or typed documents to set the title apart from the rest of the text. It gives it a certain emphasis and indicates that it is a distinct entity, like a proper name.
Typically, no. In a book review, it's more common to italicize the title of a short story. Underlining seems a bit old - fashioned in this context. Italicizing makes the title stand out clearly and is the modern convention.
Well, generally you do underline names of novels. For instance, in academic writing, when you are discussing a particular novel, underlining (or now more commonly italicizing) the title makes it clear that it is a proper name of a creative work. It's like a visual cue for the reader. Just think about when you write an essay about 'Pride and Prejudice', underlining the title shows it's not just any random words but the name of a well - known novel.
No. In modern writing, italics are the preferred way to denote short story titles. Underlining was more common in the past, especially when typewriters were used and italicizing was not as easily achievable. But now, with digital writing being the norm, italics are used for short story titles, while underlining is generally reserved for other things like hyperlinks (in some digital formats).
It depends on the style guide you are following. In general, if you are writing in a more traditional or print - based context, underlining was commonly used in the past to indicate titles of works like stories. However, in modern writing, especially for digital content, quotation marks are often used to set off the name of a story. For example, 'The Lottery' by Shirley Jackson. This helps to distinguish the title from the rest of the text clearly.
Yes, generally. Underlining gives emphasis to the name of the short story. It helps the reader to quickly identify it as a title. For instance, when you are writing about literature in a manuscript or a handwritten note, underlining a short story's name like 'An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' makes it stand out among the regular text. It is a way to show respect for the work and to clearly mark it as a proper title.
In most cases, you don't need to underline the name of a short story. Titles are typically italicized or put in quotation marks.
In general, you don't underline the name of a short story. Instead, it's common to use italics or quotation marks to distinguish the title. This is a standard convention in writing.
I usually underline important passages in novels. Underlining helps me quickly find key ideas, character descriptions, or interesting plot points when I revisit the book. It's a simple and direct way to mark what I think is significant during my reading.