Historically, castration was mainly a practice related to slavery, religious or courtly practices in some cases. Big closets were simply a part of architecture for storage. There is no evidence or historical account that combines these two disparate elements in any meaningful way.
No. There are no known historical accounts specifically about castration in big closets. Castration has been used in some historical contexts for various reasons such as in eunuch creation in some ancient cultures, but there is no connection to big closets in historical records.
I'm not aware of any specific 'castration' stories related to big closets. Castration is a very extreme and often cruel topic. Big closets are usually associated with storage or hiding places in normal stories, not such disturbing topics.
Since torture violates basic human rights, we should encourage the study of history that promotes human progress and positive values rather than focusing on such inhumane things.
Big closets can be used as a source of mystery. They can be places where characters store things they don't want others to find, like in a thriller where the antagonist has a big closet full of incriminating evidence.
One possible top shelf fiction related to big closets could be a mystery novel where a hidden object or clue is found in a big closet. For example, in some detective stories, the big closet in an old mansion might hold a key piece of evidence.
Yes. In some historical periods where there were unique power structures in certain regions or communities, such as in some matriarchal - influenced societies, there might have been accounts or tales that could include this sort of behavior as part of their cultural or disciplinary norms.
No. Historical accounts are mainly focused on important events, battles, political situations, and cultural developments. Nudity in the context of wrestling is not a typical aspect of historical records. They are more concerned with significant happenings and not such specific and often inappropriate scenarios.
Yes, in some historical accounts of Puritan families in early America. Girls were often spanked as a form of discipline. This was part of their strict religious upbringing where obedience was highly valued. For example, in diaries of the time, there are mentions of how girls were corrected when they didn't follow the rules of the household or the church teachings.
There are historical accounts in some ancient cultures. In parts of the Middle East in ancient times, there were eunuchs who sometimes became so voluntarily. While not always directly related to 'erotic' reasons in the modern sense, it could be related to power dynamics and access to certain spaces where eunuchs were preferred. But it's hard to say for sure if it was truly 'voluntary' in all cases.
There are no positive historical castration boy stories. Castration is a form of extreme violence and harm, and it is always a tragic and unjust situation for the boys involved, whether in the context of slavery, eunuch systems in some historical periods which were full of exploitation and oppression.
No. Historical accounts are supposed to be based on facts and evidence from the past. Fictional characters are made - up and don't belong in historical accounts which are meant to document real events and real people.