I think Atwood is wrong about science fiction. Can you explain why she might be wrong?

Science fiction has a long history of challenging norms, and Atwood may not be accounting for this. For instance, it has been a platform for marginalized voices to tell their stories in unique ways. If she has a narrow view of what science fiction should be, she's ignoring how it has evolved over time to include a wide range of perspectives and voices. This evolution is a key part of what makes science fiction so vibrant and relevant.

Well, perhaps she misinterprets some key concepts in science fiction. Maybe she doesn't fully understand the genre's ability to predict future technologies or social changes. Science fiction often serves as a mirror to society, and if she fails to see that, she could be wrong about it.

Because it doesn't have any science - fictional elements. Simple as that.

Well, first of all, science fiction is a genre that thrives on diversity and new perspectives. Queer voices offer exactly that. They can tell stories that straight - centered views might overlook. Second, queer writers and artists have been creating amazing science fiction works for years, from novels to movies to graphic novels. Their work is not destructive but rather constructive, adding layers of meaning, new themes, and different ways of looking at the future and humanity. So, the idea that they destroy science fiction is completely unfounded.

In 'Jurassic Park', the science of cloning dinosaurs goes wrong. Scientists managed to bring dinosaurs back to life from DNA preserved in amber. However, they didn't fully anticipate the chaos that would ensue. The dinosaurs break free from their enclosures and start attacking humans. The park's creators overlooked the fact that these were wild, prehistoric animals that couldn't be easily controlled in a modern environment.

I'm not sure what 'lifw' means in 'wrong lifw cm fan fiction'. Fan fiction is about fans creating their own stories related to a known work. So, if this is some special type of fan fiction, the 'wrong' part might imply that it goes against the norms or values of the original work or the fan community. But without knowing what 'lifw' and 'cm' stand for, it's hard to fully explain.

Simple. Harry Potter was written by J.K. Rowling as an original work. There's no connection to 'guardian' fanfiction. It has its own plot and characters that are unique.

Sorry, I don't have enough details about this 'the wrong message full story'. It could be anything from a wrong text sent to the wrong number to a miscommunication in a large - scale project.

Hard to say. You might think so if the plot or characters don't resonate with you or if it feels out of sync with your preferences. But it could also just be a momentary perception.

The two series are from different cultural backgrounds and have their own unique concepts. Harry Potter is based on Western magic and wizardry, with a focus on things like spells in Latin and a boarding school for wizards. Inuyasha, on the other hand, is set in a feudal Japanese - like world with elements like demons and samurai - like battles. So, it's impossible for Harry Potter to be a fanfiction of Inuyasha.