It means acting impulsively and then creating a false narrative to justify the action. In journalism, this is unethical as it distorts the truth. For example, a journalist might report a story without verifying facts first and then later try to cover up the lack of research by making up details.
It refers to a bad practice. 'Shoot first' implies rushing into something without proper consideration. In journalism, it could be quickly publishing a story based on rumors. 'Make up a story' then is fabricating elements to make it seem more complete or believable. This can damage the credibility of the media.
In journalism,'shoot first and make up a story' is a negative concept. It can happen when journalists are under pressure to break news quickly. They might publish something prematurely and then find themselves having to invent parts of the story to fill in the gaps. This goes against the principles of accurate and honest reporting. A good journalist should always verify facts thoroughly before reporting, not the other way around.
In journalism, being 'first to break a story' means being the first to report on a particular event or piece of news. It gives a media outlet an edge as it can attract more readers or viewers who are eager to get the latest information.
Well, in the context of journalism, a story is basically an account of something that's happened or is happening. It could be a crime, a political development, a human interest tale, or any significant occurrence that's considered newsworthy. Journalists have to present it in a clear and engaging way to capture the readers' or viewers' attention.
In journalism, 'breaking the story' means being the first to report on a particular news event. It's about getting the scoop and getting the information out to the public before other media outlets.
In journalism, 'breaking a story' means being the first to report on a significant event or piece of news. It often involves getting exclusive information and quickly getting it out to the public.
Masking the real story can take many forms. It could be through selective reporting, where only certain aspects are shown while others are omitted. It might also involve misinformation or disinformation campaigns. For instance, in political scenarios, parties may try to mask the real story about a candidate's past actions or policies to gain an advantage. However, in a democratic and informed society, it's crucial that the media and individuals work towards revealing the real story.
In journalism, earning the full story means getting all the facts. Reporters have to talk to multiple sources, not just rely on one side. For example, in a political scandal, they need to interview both the accused and the accusers. They also need to verify information from reliable documents and data.
Well, 'telling the whole story' in journalism is crucial. It's about providing a comprehensive view. For example, when covering a political event, journalists should not only report what a politician says but also look into the background of the policies, the impact on different groups of people, and any possible hidden agendas. This way, the public can get a full understanding and make informed decisions.
No. In creative writing, while there is room for imagination, it's not about randomly shooting first and making up a story without a plan. A good story needs a structure, characters with motives, and a logical flow. Just making things up without thought won't result in a compelling piece.
It could mean that their story is considered the most relevant or popular at the moment.
Well, 'left her without a top story' might imply that she lost the opportunity to have a prominent or headline - worthy story. This could be because of competition. Other journalists might have scooped the story she was working on. Or it could be due to a lack of resources. If she didn't have enough time or access to information, she would end up without a top story.