What evidence does Tim Swartz present to support time travel as fact not fiction?

Time travel is still largely a mystery. While Tim Swartz might claim it to be fact not fiction, we have to consider the current state of science. We know that time behaves differently in extreme conditions like near a black hole. But from a practical standpoint, we haven't been able to achieve time travel. Swartz may be basing his view on emerging scientific ideas that are on the fringes of our understanding, such as quantum entanglement and its potential relation to time. However, until we have a clear demonstration, it remains a very speculative area.

For the 'fact' side, there are some reports of strange magnetic fields and unusual animal behavior on the ranch. But for the 'fiction' side, most of the evidence is anecdotal. People claim to have seen UFOs or strange creatures, but there's no hard scientific evidence like clear photos or reliable eyewitness testimony that can be independently verified. The stories often seem to change and get more elaborate over time, which is a sign of fictional elements being added.

One major piece of evidence is the way the story defies the laws of physics as we know them. For example, the concept of 'tesseracting' which is a form of traveling through space - time in a way that is not possible according to our current understanding of physics. The characters are able to move instantaneously across vast distances and through time, which is clearly a fictional device used to drive the story forward.

Fiction. As of now, there's no scientific evidence to support the existence of time travel. While theories like Einstein's relativity suggest the possibility of time dilation, which is a different concept from the kind of time travel we see in movies. We can't just hop into a machine and go back to the dinosaurs or forward to the future at will.

Fiction. Consider this, in all of our exploration of the oceans, which is still not complete but quite extensive, we have not found any conclusive evidence of mermaids. The idea of a half - human, half - fish creature goes against the known biological principles. For a mermaid to exist as commonly depicted, it would require a very strange and unlikely combination of mammalian and fish - like characteristics that have no basis in evolutionary biology.

Fact. There has been new evidence emerging over time that supports the existence of megalodon in the past. Fossil records are a major part of this evidence. These fossils show the large size of their teeth and some skeletal remains which give us an idea of their massive size and structure. Also, studies on ancient ocean ecosystems suggest that an apex predator like megalodon could have thrived in those conditions.

Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.

Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.

It means trying to figure out if the things associated with Tim Ballard are true or made - up. Maybe there are stories about him that seem too good to be true or lack proper evidence, so we need to investigate.

I'm not sure who 'tim ballard' specifically is without more context. If he's a relatively unknown individual, it could be that some of the stories about him are a mix of fact and fiction, or more likely fiction if he's not a well - documented public figure.