Yes, Gene died in the true story.
No, Gene doesn't die. The story has a different outcome for him.
No, it's likely fictional. Most stories like this are made up for entertainment or to convey a certain message.
I'm not sure. It depends on which true story you're referring to. Maybe you could give me more details?
Well, the circumstances of Gene's death in the true story could be quite complex. It might involve a combination of factors such as an accident, illness, or some other unforeseen event. But without more detailed information, it's hard to give a precise answer.
It depends on which version of the story you're referring to. In some adaptations, Gene did die, but in others, he might have survived. You need to be more specific about the particular True Story you have in mind.
I'm not sure. It depends on the specific true story you're referring to. There are many different true stories out there, and without more context, it's hard to say for sure if Gene died.
Well, Gene's death in the true story could have been caused by a sudden and unexpected event, like a heart attack or a tragic incident. Or perhaps it was a result of a long-term health issue that gradually worsened over time.
Typically, no. Genes are part of our genetic code and are influenced by things like inheritance, environmental factors, and random mutations. A kid isn't capable of causing harm to a gene in the sense of directly attacking or destroying it. While a kid's lifestyle choices in the future might influence gene expression, it's not the same as harming a gene in a traditional sense. So in a true story, it's very improbable.
There is no such general situation in real life where a 'kid' can directly 'kill' a 'gene' in the literal sense. Genes are part of our biological makeup and can be affected by various factors like mutations, environmental influences, and diseases, but not by a kid in a murderous way.