It might imply that the plot has some unique or unexpected elements that also lead to humorous situations. For instance, the way the characters interact within the plot could be both different from the norm and funny.
It implies that the plot is likely to have some originality that is tied to the humor. The 'novel' aspect could mean that the story doesn't follow the common plot formulas. Instead, it might take a different path which then gives rise to the funny aspects. For example, the story could start from an unusual premise, like a character waking up with a superpower that is completely useless in a normal world but creates hilarious situations as they try to use it in daily life.
The phrase could suggest that the plot is not a typical one. Since it's 'novel', there are likely new ideas in the plot structure. And being 'kind of a funny story', these new plot elements probably lead to comical events or interactions. Maybe there are strange coincidences or unusual character relationships that drive the funny parts of the plot.
It could imply that the story has some elements that are humorous or unexpected.
It might imply that there is a story which has some elements of humor in it.
It could imply that the plot has an element of unpredictability and humor. The 'greatest system' might suggest a complex plot structure that still manages to be funny.
It simply means that a novel is a form of presenting a narrative or tale. Novels are structured to tell a story with characters, plot, and settings.
This means the plot might revolve around cooperation. Without the big bad wolf, the characters in the story could be working together to achieve something like building a big community garden or a bridge over a small stream.
It could imply that there are more twists and turns to come. For example, in a mystery movie, just when you think the villain has been caught, this statement might suggest that there's a bigger mastermind behind the scenes still at large.
The story may indicate that family loyalties are complex and can change over time. It could show that while we have a natural inclination towards loyalty to our families, external factors and personal growth can shape and redefine those loyalties.
This description is highly inappropriate and offensive. We should avoid such disrespectful and vulgar language.
It implies that there are no more events or developments in the story. Everything has been told and concluded.
It implies that there is more to a story that has either been partially told or is known to some extent, and now one is asking about the remaining parts of that story.