What does Ebert's review of 'Marriage Story' say?

Ebert probably praised the unique non - linear narrative structure of 'Pulp Fiction'. It made the movie engaging and different from traditional storytelling.

Ebert might have praised the non - linear storytelling in Pulp Fiction. He could have mentioned how the movie's unique plot structure keeps the audience engaged throughout.

Well, Roger Ebert likely pointed out how Quentin Tarantino's writing in Pulp Fiction was so sharp and full of dark humor. The dialogue was so well - crafted that it made the characters come alive in a very vivid way. He may have commented on how the movie was a game - changer in terms of independent filmmaking at the time, with its edgy style and mix of different genres. It was a movie that didn't follow the traditional Hollywood formula and yet managed to capture a huge audience. The way it played with time and told different stories that all connected in the end was a big part of what made it so special, and Ebert would surely have had something to say about that.

Since I don't know the exact review, I can only assume. It might start by giving an overview of the story in 'Marriage Story'. Then it could highlight the great performances of the actors, which bring the complex emotions of the characters to life. It may also mention how the film effectively shows the pain and confusion that comes with the end of a marriage.

I'm not sure specifically as I haven't read his exact review. But generally, he might have talked about the charm of the story, the characters like Ralphie, and how it captures the essence of Christmas for a young boy.

The New York Times review of 'Marriage Story' may have focused on several aspects. Firstly, it could have talked about how the movie delved deep into the characters' psyches. The lead actors' portrayals were so nuanced that it made the story feel very real. Secondly, the review might have mentioned the film's pacing. It didn't seem rushed, allowing the audience to fully experience each stage of the marriage's dissolution. Additionally, the movie's use of dialogue was probably praised. The conversations between the characters were so raw and honest, which added to the overall authenticity of the story. It's a movie that doesn't shy away from showing the ugly as well as the beautiful parts of a relationship, and the review may have highlighted this aspect as well.

He might have said that the characters are very well - developed.

Ebert gave it a positive review, praising its heartwarming and nostalgic tone.

His review could highlight the movie's unique elements such as its dialogue. The sharp and witty dialogue in 'Pulp Fiction' is a big part of its charm, and Ebert may have analyzed how it works to create the movie's atmosphere. Also, by discussing the characters, Ebert's review might make viewers more aware of their complexity and how they interact with each other to drive the story forward. This in turn helps in a deeper understanding of the overall plot and themes of the movie.

Another aspect could be the film's cultural impact. Pulp Fiction was a huge cultural phenomenon. Ebert may have pointed out how it influenced other movies in terms of style, dialogue, and the way stories are told. It popularized a certain type of edgy, post - modern filmmaking that was quite different from the mainstream at that time.