Most likely not. While the New York Times is a respected source, stories about aliens often lack conclusive proof.
It's doubtful. Alien stories in general, even those in the New York Times, usually rely on unconfirmed sightings or circumstantial evidence. There's no solid scientific evidence yet to prove the existence of aliens as described in such stories.
No. The 'ny times alien story' probably hasn't been proven true. These stories often involve speculation and anecdotal evidence. Scientists demand more rigorous evidence like physical specimens or repeatable experiments to confirm the existence of aliens, which these stories usually don't provide.
No. Since most alien stories are often based on unsubstantiated claims like sightings or personal experiences which lack scientific proof, it's very unlikely that the 'New York Times Alien Story' has been proven true.
As of now, I'm not aware that any definitive proof has been established. Allegations of treason are extremely serious and require a high level of evidence. Just because the New York Times reports on it doesn't mean it's proven.
The truth of the 'kid in balloon story' varies. Some of these stories have been verified as true, where a child was actually in a precarious situation with a balloon. But there are also many stories that turned out to be untrue. It might be due to misidentification or misinformation. People sometimes jump to conclusions too quickly when they see a balloon in the air and assume there's a child inside.
No. There's no evidence to suggest that any 'dark story' about Cocomelon is true. It's likely just unfounded speculation or rumors.
As of now, there is no evidence to suggest that any such 'Benzema sex tape story' is true. It could very well be a baseless rumor.
Probably not. Often these kinds of stories are just rumors that spread without any real evidence.
There's no way to tell without more information about the specific 'Tim Hortons Snake Story'. It could be a tall tale, or it might be based on a real incident that got exaggerated over time. But as of now, with no real proof or verification, it's hard to claim that it's been proven true.
Given that the 'gay musk story' remains so undefined, there is no way to determine its truthfulness. It might be a work of pure fiction, in which case it's false, but until we have a proper account of what this story actually is, we can't make a determination about whether it has been proven true or false.
No. Without any reliable sources or evidence, we can't consider it true. It could be a baseless rumor.
Since I don't even know what the story is, it's impossible to say if it has been proven true or not.