It could be that his storytelling doesn't resonate with the traditional storytelling norms that a lot of people are used to. In many classic stories, there are clear arcs for the plot and characters. However, Andrea Sorrentino might be more experimental in his approach. He could be more focused on creating a mood or atmosphere rather than a linear story. But this can be off - putting for those who prefer a more conventional narrative. For instance, if he uses a lot of symbolism that is not easily decipherable, it can make his story seem incomprehensible to some.
Well, perhaps it's because his stories lack a clear beginning, middle, and end. His way of presenting events could be too abstract or disjointed for some. For example, if he jumps around in time too much without proper transitions, it can make it difficult for the viewer or reader to piece together the story. And also, the characters' development might not be as straightforward as expected, leaving the audience feeling lost about who the characters really are and what they're supposed to represent.
Some might say so because his narrative structure may seem confusing to them. Maybe the plotlines he creates don't flow in a way that is easy for certain audiences to follow.
One sign could be a lack of coherence in the plot. If events seem randomly strung together, it gives that impression.
Some people say 'don't tell stories' because they want to hear the truth. Stories might be made - up or exaggerated, and they prefer facts.
Some men might not tell the truth because they want to protect their image. For example, they may exaggerate their achievements to seem more impressive.
The bible is mainly a religious text focused on certain religious ideas and beliefs. There are many aspects of human history, culture, and daily life that it doesn't cover in detail. For example, it doesn't give a full account of the scientific knowledge or the political systems of the time. It's more about the relationship between God and humanity from a religious point of view.
Maybe it's because his endings often leave a lot of ambiguity. For example, in some of his works, the conclusion doesn't neatly tie up all the loose ends. It can make readers feel that there are still many unanswered questions, as if the story just stops rather than truly coming to a satisfying end.
It might be due to their strong sense of community. In Ireland, stories are shared around the fireplace or in the local pub. This communal aspect allows stories to be refined and passed on. Also, their history of hardship and triumph provides a rich tapestry for storytelling. From tales of the potato famine to stories of the Easter Rising, these historical events are woven into their storytelling fabric, creating a unique and captivating narrative style that stands out.
The sea is a powerful and somewhat intimidating force. It has been around for eons, and during that time, it has been part of so many historical events, from ancient seafaring to modern - day oil drilling. However, it has no means of verbal or written communication. So, when people say this, they are emphasizing the sea's silent and uncommunicative nature. It just keeps on existing, regardless of whether we want to know its secrets or not.
People say it when they don't trust what someone is about to say. They suspect it's going to be a false or exaggerated account.
Another possibility is that he is shy or lacks confidence when it comes to speaking in front of others. This can cause him to stumble over his words or forget important parts of the story. Additionally, if he doesn't have a good understanding of different story genres and their conventions, he may struggle to tell a story in a way that is expected or engaging.
There could be several reasons. They might find non-fiction more educational or believe fiction doesn't relate to their practical lives. Also, they might have trouble getting into the stories or find the writing styles of most fiction unappealing.