In general, surveys do not tell the whole story. There are many aspects that surveys may not cover. One major issue is the self - selection bias. People who choose to participate in a survey may have different characteristics from those who don't. For example, in an online survey about a new technology, those who are more interested in technology are more likely to respond. This may skew the results. Additionally, surveys are often time - bound. They only represent a snapshot of a particular moment, and things can change rapidly. For example, a survey about consumer shopping habits during a holiday season may not be applicable to other times of the year as consumer behavior can be influenced by many factors like sales promotions, seasonal needs, and cultural events that occur throughout the year.
Definitely not. Respondents may not always be honest. They could give answers they think are more socially acceptable instead of their true feelings. Moreover, surveys often can't capture the full complexity of a situation. For instance, in a survey about a new product, it can only gather basic opinions like whether people like it or not, but can't fully explore the potential reasons behind their preferences, such as cultural background, personal habits, and past experiences that all interact in a complex way.
Surveys do not tell the whole story. Consider a survey about a community's health. It might ask about diet and exercise habits, but it can't fully account for genetic factors, environmental pollution, or stress levels which also play crucial roles in health. And in some cases, respondents may be in a hurry when answering surveys and not give accurate or complete answers.
Surveys often provide a snapshot but might miss underlying factors or individual variations. They can be influenced by how questions are framed and who participates.
Scars don't necessarily tell the whole story. There could be underlying reasons, unexpressed feelings, and circumstances that aren't visible on the surface. So, we can't rely solely on scars to know everything.
Yes, they don't. Happy pictures often show only a moment and can hide the complexity and challenges behind.
Well, that's a matter of interpretation. Different people have different views on what constitutes the 'whole story'. For some, the Bible offers comprehensive teachings and insights; for others, they might feel there are gaps or areas that could have been covered more extensively.
Definitely not. A picture is limited in what it can convey. It might show a scene, but it can't communicate the backstory, emotions, or full sequence of events that led up to that moment.
No. Statistics often only present a partial view. For example, in a study about a new drug's effectiveness. The statistics might show a high success rate in a controlled clinical trial. But it doesn't tell about potential long - term side effects, how the drug will work in different populations like the elderly or those with multiple health conditions. Also, it doesn't show the real - life experiences of patients, such as how the drug affects their daily life quality, their ability to work or engage in social activities. Statistics are just numbers, and they can be manipulated or misinterpreted if not considered in a broader context.
It could be that the records were created with a specific purpose or audience in mind, and thus didn't include everything. Sometimes, there might also be errors or omissions that prevent them from presenting the full picture.
Not really. Scars in MHW might hint at some past events, but they don't always give a complete picture.
Often, statistics don't tell the whole story. They might ignore context, individual differences, and unmeasurable factors that can significantly influence the situation.