Is there any evidence for the Karna Pishachini real story?

Karna Pishachini could potentially be a story within the rich tapestry of Indian folklore. In Indian mythology, there are countless tales of gods, demons, and other supernatural beings. Pishachinis are often depicted as malevolent spirits. If Karna is a character in this story, perhaps he is either a hero who has to face this pishachini, or he could be somehow related to the origin or control of this spirit. It might also be a story passed down through generations in certain regions, with different versions having their own unique twists and turns.

Karna is a significant character in the Mahabharata. He was born to Kunti before her marriage. She abandoned him out of fear of society. Karna was raised by a charioteer. He was a great warrior, known for his loyalty, especially to Duryodhana. Despite facing discrimination due to his low - caste upbringing, he rose to be one of the most formidable fighters in the Kurukshetra war. He was cursed by Parashurama when his true identity was discovered during his training. In the end, he fought heroically on the side of the Kauravas.

As of now, there is no conclusive evidence in the Bigfoot real story. There are only blurry photos, unconfirmed footprints, and eyewitness accounts which are not reliable enough scientifically.

There is very little evidence for the Holy Grail real story. The tales of the Grail are mainly part of medieval literature and religious folklore. While some might claim that certain ancient cups or vessels could be the Grail, there is no scientific or historical proof to back it up. It's more of a symbolic and mythical concept that has been passed down through the ages.

Yes, there is some evidence. There are early Welsh texts like the 'Annales Cambriae' that mention a figure who could be related to Arthur. Also, some archaeological finds in Britain might be linked to the time period when Arthur was supposed to have lived.

There may be no real evidence for the 'Beast of Bangalore'. Legends like this tend to grow without any solid proof. It could be that people just like to tell spooky stories, and this one about the 'beast' is just another example. Maybe someone made up a story for fun, and others just ran with it without any factual basis.

Probably not much hard evidence. Most of these haunted stories are based on hearsay and personal accounts which can be unreliable.

Yes, there is some evidence. Archaeological finds in areas where Vikings were known to have raided, like parts of England, could potentially be related to Ragnar's raids. Also, some place - names in Scandinavia might have connections to him or his family. However, it's not conclusive evidence as many Vikings were raiding during that time.

Karna was the son of Surya and Kunti in the Mahabharata. He was born before Kunti's marriage. Karna was a great warrior but faced many hardships. He was brought up by a charioteer. Despite his noble birth, he was treated as a low - caste due to his upbringing. He was a loyal friend of Duryodhana and fought on the side of the Kauravas in the great war.

There were some pieces of evidence in the 'Haunting in Connecticut' real story. The family's testimonies were a big part of it. They claimed to have experienced various paranormal phenomena. For example, they talked about feeling cold spots in certain areas of the house, which is often associated with the presence of spirits in paranormal beliefs. Also, the strange noises they heard were documented in their accounts. However, skeptics would argue that these could be explained by natural causes like old house creaking or drafts.