Is custom erotic fiction acceptable in literature?

No. Such content is not acceptable. Violent and erotic elements combined are often inappropriate and can be disturbing. It goes against moral and ethical standards in most cases.

It's a mixed bag. Some mainstream literature may contain elements of erotic fiction but in a more subdued or artistic way. However, purely erotic fiction is not always fully accepted in mainstream literature. There are those who consider it too racy or inappropriate for a general audience. But as views on sexuality change, some boundaries are being re - evaluated.

Definitely not. It's a form of exploitation. People with amputations are real individuals with their own identities and experiences, not objects for sexualized stories. This type of 'fiction' perpetuates harmful stereotypes and disrespects the disabled community.

Mostly not. Mainstream literature is more about exploring various aspects of human experience, such as emotions, relationships, and social issues in a way that is accessible and appropriate for a broad range of people. Erotic fiction, by its very nature of being centered around sexual themes, is not in line with the values and content that mainstream literature promotes. While there may be some blurred lines at times, on the whole, printable erotic fiction has no place in mainstream literature.

In mainstream literature, semi - erotic fiction is a controversial topic. Generally, mainstream literature often focuses on a wide range of themes that are more family - friendly and suitable for a broad audience. However, some semi - erotic elements might be incorporated in certain literary works with a more mature or complex narrative purpose, but it's not typically the dominant or widely accepted form.

In general, it is not acceptable. While literature explores a wide range of themes, the combination of the medical field, which is associated with professionalism and helping people, with erotic content is not in line with the values that society promotes through literature. It can also objectify medical professionals and patients in inappropriate ways.

In mainstream literature, the focus is more on positive values, complex characters, and meaningful stories. 'Nasty erotic fiction' is mainly centered around sexual and often improper themes. Such content is not in line with the general goals of mainstream literature which aims to educate, inspire or at least provide a positive aesthetic experience. So it is not acceptable.

Most of the time, mainstream literature aims to appeal to a wide audience, including different age groups and cultural backgrounds. Fiction erotic books, with their explicit nature, are not suitable for general consumption and thus not acceptable in mainstream literature. There are many other forms of literature that can explore relationships, love, and human nature in a more appropriate and profound way.

In my opinion, it's a bit of a gray area. On one hand, if it is done tastefully and with the intention of exploring deeper human emotions and relationships related to sexuality, it could have some merit. But on the other hand, it can easily cross the line into being just pornographic rather than true literature. Many traditional publishers tend to avoid it to maintain a certain standard and reputation.

Illustrated erotic fiction is not acceptable in mainstream literature. Mainstream publishers usually shy away from such content as it can be offensive to many. It focuses on sexual themes that are not in line with the broader themes like self - improvement, social issues, and cultural exploration that are common in mainstream literature.