The scorpion in the story tries to persuade the frog by presenting a seemingly rational case. It says that stinging the frog while being carried across the river would be suicidal for both of them. The scorpion plays on the frog's belief in self - preservation and basic common sense. The frog, perhaps naively, accepts this reasoning and allows the scorpion on its back. However, the scorpion's instinctive nature to sting overcomes any rational thought, and it still stings the frog, leading to their doom. This shows how our inbuilt natures can sometimes override logic and reason.
In the story, the scorpion convinces the frog by using a logical argument. It tells the frog that it has no reason to sting it while they are crossing the river. After all, if it does, they will both perish. So, the frog, believing in this logic, decides to carry the scorpion. But, of course, the scorpion's nature takes over in the end.
In the end, the scorpion gives in to its natural instinct to sting. Since they are in the middle of the river and the frog is carrying the scorpion, once the scorpion stings, the frog is unable to continue swimming. So, both of them perish in the water. It's a rather tragic ending that emphasizes the consequences of the scorpion's inability to control its nature.
The moral is that some creatures, like the scorpion in the story, can't change their nature. Even if it means their own destruction, they will still act according to their instinctive and often harmful behavior. Just as the scorpion stung the frog despite knowing it would lead to both of their deaths because it was in its nature to sting.
The moral is often about people's (or in this case, animals') inherent natures. The scorpion stings the frog even though it means they both will die, showing that some creatures can't change their fundamental, self - destructive behaviors.
The moral is that some people's nature is hard to change. Just like the scorpion, even though it knew stinging the frog would lead to their both deaths, it still did it because it was in its nature to sting.
The moral is that some people (or in this case, the scorpion) can't change their nature. The scorpion stings the frog even though it means they both will die, showing that it can't resist its instinct to harm, despite the frog's kindness in carrying it across the river.
The moral is that some creatures, like the scorpion in the story, can't change their nature. Just as the scorpion stings the frog even though it means their doom, it shows that evil or self - destructive tendencies are hard to overcome.
One possible moral is that you should be cautious when dealing with those who have a known negative trait. The frog in the story should have been more careful with the scorpion, as it knew the scorpion was dangerous. So, it warns us to not be too trusting of those who may harm us. Another moral could be that some things are just in our nature and are hard to control. The scorpion's sting was its nature, and it couldn't stop itself, which can also be a lesson about self - awareness.
The scorpion frog story is likely a fable or a tale that involves a scorpion and a frog. Usually, these kinds of stories carry a moral lesson. Maybe it's about how the nature of the scorpion, which might be something like its instinct to sting, causes problems even when it's in a situation where it needs the frog's help, like crossing a river. But without more context, it's hard to say exactly what this specific story is about.
The moral is that some people's nature cannot be changed. Just like the scorpion, it stings the frog even though it means they both will die. It shows that one should be cautious of those with inherently harmful tendencies.
The two main characters are the frog and the scorpion. The frog is kind - hearted enough to offer to help the scorpion cross the river. However, the scorpion has a stinging nature which ultimately leads to a tragic end for both of them.