Did the New York Times Retract the Sicknick Story Completely?

As of July 2023, yes, The New York Times has retracted parts of its reporting on Officer Sicknick's death. Their initial report had some inaccuracies regarding the circumstances of his death at the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

As of July 2023, The New York Times has not retracted the Sicknick story.

It could be due to inaccuracies in their sources. If the people or documents they based their story on were wrong, they would have to retract it.

No. There is no record of the New York Times retracting any reports related to Sicknick events.

No, the New York Times has not retracted the Sicknick story. The reporting on Sicknick was part of a broader narrative about events that took place. While there may be different viewpoints and some争议 around the details, the NY Times has stood by its reporting. There have been no official statements or actions from the newspaper to suggest that they are taking back what they initially reported regarding Sicknick.

It could be that new information emerged which made their original story inaccurate. Maybe there were misunderstandings about the events related to Sicknick, and as more facts came to light, they had no choice but to retract.

Another possibility is that there were legal issues associated with the story. Perhaps it contained information that violated someone's privacy or was defamatory. In such cases, rather than facing potential legal consequences, they choose to retract the story.

Perhaps the sources they used for the MAGA story turned out to be unreliable. Journalists rely on sources, and if those sources are found to be untrustworthy, a retraction is necessary. Another reason could be that there were inaccuracies in their fact - checking process.

No.

Probably because they found out it was untrue.