What is the significance of the New York Times Weinstein story?

The impact was far - reaching. It not only brought down Harvey Weinstein but also sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry. It led to increased awareness about power dynamics and the abuse of power in workplaces. The story made it clear that such behavior would no longer be tolerated and encouraged a broader conversation about gender equality.

The story had a profound impact. Once the New York Times broke the story about Harvey Weinstein, it sent shockwaves through the entertainment industry. It led to Weinstein's downfall. His once - powerful position in Hollywood was quickly dismantled. Studios cut ties with him, and his projects were halted. It also changed the conversation around power dynamics and the treatment of women in the workplace.

The New York Times story about Harvey Weinstein exposed his long - term pattern of sexual harassment. It was a bombshell report that brought to light numerous accusations against him from multiple women in the film industry. This story was a major turning point as it led to the #MeToo movement, which encouraged more women to come forward with their experiences of sexual harassment and assault in various fields.

The New York Times story had a huge impact on Harvey Weinstein. It was the start of his downfall. Once the story was out, it led to public outcry and more women coming forward with their stories of harassment. His reputation was quickly and irreparably damaged, and it also sparked a broader conversation about sexual harassment in Hollywood.

The New York Times likely broke the Weinstein story through investigative journalism. Reporters would have talked to multiple sources, including victims of Weinstein's alleged harassment. They probably gathered evidence over a period of time, such as emails, witness statements, and other relevant documentation before publishing the story.

It was Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey of The New York Times who broke the Weinstein story. Their work had a significant impact and sparked important conversations.

The main revelations were Weinstein's long - term pattern of sexual harassment. The story detailed how he used his power and influence in Hollywood to coerce women into unwanted sexual situations.

Journalists at the New York Times used a combination of methods. They started by getting tips from people in the industry who knew about Weinstein's behavior. Then, they did in - depth interviews with the victims. They would have spent a lot of time building trust with these women so that they could get the full story. Additionally, they might have looked into financial records or other business - related documents to see if there were any signs of hush - money payments or other unethical practices related to covering up his actions.

I'm not sure exactly who wrote it. You might need to do some more research on that.

The New York Times journalists likely did a lot of investigative work. They probably interviewed many sources, including some of the women who had experienced harassment by Harvey Weinstein. They might have also looked into financial records, work contracts, and any patterns of behavior that seemed suspicious.