No. Statistics often only present a partial view. For example, in a study about a new drug's effectiveness. The statistics might show a high success rate in a controlled clinical trial. But it doesn't tell about potential long - term side effects, how the drug will work in different populations like the elderly or those with multiple health conditions. Also, it doesn't show the real - life experiences of patients, such as how the drug affects their daily life quality, their ability to work or engage in social activities. Statistics are just numbers, and they can be manipulated or misinterpreted if not considered in a broader context.
Often, statistics don't tell the whole story. They might ignore context, individual differences, and unmeasurable factors that can significantly influence the situation.
Not at all. Consider a city where the crime rate statistics seem to be improving. But what about the quality of policing? The stats don't show if the police are using fair and just methods. Also, crime rate stats don't account for the impact of crime on the community. A neighborhood with a few high - profile crimes can have a significant negative impact on the well - being of its residents, even if the overall crime rate is low. There are so many factors related to crime that simple statistics don't cover.
Well, statistics often focus on specific data points and averages. They might miss out on the context, individual experiences, and complex factors that shape a situation.
You need to choose relevant and accurate statistics. Present them clearly and simply so people can understand easily.
Definitely not. Respondents may not always be honest. They could give answers they think are more socially acceptable instead of their true feelings. Moreover, surveys often can't capture the full complexity of a situation. For instance, in a survey about a new product, it can only gather basic opinions like whether people like it or not, but can't fully explore the potential reasons behind their preferences, such as cultural background, personal habits, and past experiences that all interact in a complex way.
Surveys do not tell the whole story. Consider a survey about a community's health. It might ask about diet and exercise habits, but it can't fully account for genetic factors, environmental pollution, or stress levels which also play crucial roles in health. And in some cases, respondents may be in a hurry when answering surveys and not give accurate or complete answers.
It could be that the records were created with a specific purpose or audience in mind, and thus didn't include everything. Sometimes, there might also be errors or omissions that prevent them from presenting the full picture.
Not really. Scars in MHW might hint at some past events, but they don't always give a complete picture.
Scars don't necessarily tell the whole story. There could be underlying reasons, unexpressed feelings, and circumstances that aren't visible on the surface. So, we can't rely solely on scars to know everything.
Pictures are just snapshots. They capture a moment but can't convey all the details, emotions, or background that a full story might have.