Can historical novel and historical fiction be used interchangeably?

Yes, they can. As I said before, they don't have different meanings.

No. 'Historical fiction' is the correct and widely - used term for the genre. 'Historic fiction' is either a less common form or potentially a misusage. So, they shouldn't be used interchangeably.

Historical events are a goldmine for historical fiction. You can start by researching events that interest you. For instance, the Industrial Revolution. This event brought about massive changes in society, from the way people worked to how they lived. In your historical fiction, you could focus on a family of factory workers. You can describe their daily struggles, their hopes for a better life, and how the new industrial environment affected their relationships. You can also include real - life inventions and social movements of that time to make the story more vivid. By using historical events in this way, you can both educate readers about the past and tell an engaging fictional story.

No. 'New' and 'novel' can't be used interchangeably. 'New' is about being fresh in terms of time or existence. 'Novel' is more about being unique and original. For instance, a new dress may just be recently bought, but a novel dress would imply an unusual design.

Sure! You can use historical quotes in fiction. They can add authenticity and depth to your story.

Definitely not. As I said before,'storey' is about the floors in a building. You can't say 'I live on the third story of the building' when you mean the physical floor. And you can't use'storey' when you are talking about a bedtime story or a story in a book. They have distinct meanings and uses.

They can also shape a character's beliefs. If a character witnesses a revolution, they may change their political views. This change can be a major part of their character arc. For example, they might start as a supporter of the monarchy but become a revolutionary after seeing the oppression of the common people during the historical upheaval.

It depends. In some cases, if used within an accurate historical context and with proper sensitivity, it might be appropriate. But it's a very sensitive matter and needs to be handled carefully.

Dates in historical fiction are used to set the time period accurately. For example, if a story is set during the Renaissance, a specific date range like 1400 - 1600 might be alluded to. This helps the reader understand the historical context, including the social, political, and cultural norms of that time.

Sort of. In casual writing or speech, either might be understood. However, in formal writing, especially in the context of professional storytelling like in novels or screenplays, 'backstory' is preferred. Because it is more concise and has become the standard in the industry. 'Back story' may seem a bit more like a phrase that is not as refined, but it can still get the point across if you use it.