What does 'never let facts ruin a good story' mean?

It means that sometimes people prefer a fictional or exaggerated version of a story rather than the version based strictly on facts. They don't want the cold, hard facts to disrupt the interesting or exciting narrative they have in mind.

It basically means that sometimes you should focus on the entertainment or appeal of a story rather than getting too hung up on whether everything is strictly factual.

Basically, 'never let the facts spoil a good story' is about the idea that a story's allure can be more important than its factual basis. In journalism, this would be unethical, but in creative writing or casual storytelling, it can be different. Think of tall tales or legends. These often deviate from the facts but are still great stories. People might change details or events to fit the mood or message they want to convey in their story. For instance, a fisherman might exaggerate the size of the fish he caught to make his fishing story more exciting for his friends at the pub.

It could imply that Hearst (perhaps a media entity or person named Hearst) has an attitude of not allowing facts to disrupt a story that they consider 'good'. Maybe they prioritize the narrative or entertainment value over strict factual accuracy.

Sure. In the movie 'Jurassic Park'. There are many scientific inaccuracies. Dinosaurs couldn't actually be re - created in the way shown in the movie with the current technology. But these inaccuracies don't stop the movie from being an amazing story full of adventure and wonder.

It means that in creative writing, sometimes strict adherence to facts can limit the imaginative and engaging aspects of a story. For example, a historical fiction writer might tweak some minor historical details to make the plot more exciting or to better fit the character arcs. It's about prioritizing the narrative's entertainment value over absolute truth.

He meant that sometimes in storytelling, strict adherence to facts can limit creativity. A good story might be more engaging if it bends or ignores some facts for the sake of entertainment or making a point.

It means that sometimes, for the sake of a great narrative, we shouldn't let the cold, hard facts get in the way. For example, in fictional stories, we often suspend our disbelief and accept the made - up world. If we were to constantly apply real - world logic and facts, it could destroy the magic of the story.

It means that sometimes people prefer to stick to an interesting or fictional narrative rather than let the boring or inconvenient truth disrupt it. For example, in fictional stories, authors might take some liberties with historical facts to make the story more engaging.

Well, it implies that a good story is more important than the truth in some cases. Take folk tales or legends, for instance. They are full of elements that may not be strictly true but are there to convey a moral or just to be an exciting story. People like to be entertained, and if the truth gets in the way of that entertainment, this saying suggests that the truth can be sacrificed for the sake of a great story.