Was Alfred Mandela real or fictional in World War 2?

It's fictional. World War 2 had its own set of real - life people involved such as Churchill, Roosevelt, Hitler, etc. But 'Alfred Mandela' is not among them. There is no evidence of such a person existing during that time, so it's not real.

I think you might be confusing Mandela with someone else. Nelson Mandela was born in 1918 and was mainly involved in the anti - apartheid struggle in South Africa which was much later than World War 2. So in the context of World War 2, he is not relevant as he didn't play any role during that time, and he was a real person in a different historical context.

The concept of Alfred Mendela in relation to World War 2 is fictional. There's no evidence or historical record to suggest any such person was involved in World War 2. Nelson Mandela was a real individual who fought for equality in South Africa, but his life's work was not related to World War 2. It seems like a misunderstanding or misinformation to connect an unknown 'Alfred Mendela' to World War 2.

In most 'Alfred the Great fiction', Alfred the Great is often based on the historical figure. However, the fictional works may add some fictional elements like fictionalized dialogues, relationships, or adventures to make the story more engaging.

Nelson Mandela was a great anti - apartheid revolutionary. He fought against the unjust racial segregation system in South Africa for decades. He was imprisoned for 27 years but remained steadfast in his beliefs. Eventually, his efforts led to the end of apartheid and he became South Africa's first black president, symbolizing hope and equality for all South Africans.

Probably not. Often such 'horror stories' are baseless rumors. Without proper evidence, we can't assume it's real.

The Trojan War was most likely based on some real events. There's historical and archaeological evidence that suggests elements of the story have roots in reality.

Fictional World War 2 books can provide a more personal view. For example, in 'The Book Thief', we see the war through the eyes of a child. This makes the events more relatable. It can show the human side of the war that statistics and historical facts may not fully convey.

Fictional war books can provide different perspectives. For example, they can show the individual experiences of soldiers, like in 'All Quiet on the Western Front'. By understanding the fear, confusion, and camaraderie at the personal level, we can better understand the overall impact of war on people. This can then be related to real - world conflicts where soldiers also face similar emotions.

Fictional war stories can make real - world conflicts more relatable. For example, through characters' emotions in fictional stories, we can better understand the fear and stress that soldiers in real wars might feel. They can also show the political and social aspects that lead to war, like in '1984' which, while not a traditional war story, shows how power struggles can lead to a state of perpetual war.