How does Hemingway's writing style differ in his best sellers and short stories?

His use of understatement is also notable. Instead of elaborate descriptions of emotions, he often shows them through the characters' actions or sparse dialogue. In his short stories, the setting is often described in a minimal yet vivid way. For example, the description of the Spanish landscape in some of his bullfighting - related stories gives a sense of place without being overly detailed, but still manages to draw the reader in.

His short stories often have a more focused narrative. Novels can have multiple plotlines and a large cast of characters, but short stories tend to zero in on one main event or a small group of characters. McCarthy uses this limited scope in his short stories to create a more intense and immediate impact. For example, a short story might be centered around a single encounter that reveals a lot about the characters and their world.

Hemingway's best sellers often have more complex plots and a broader scope. They might deal with larger themes over a longer narrative arc. His short stories, on the other hand, are more concise. They can focus on a single moment or a brief period, and often convey a very intense emotion or idea in a compact form.

Hemingway's writing style in these stories is characterized by simplicity. He uses short, straightforward sentences that convey a lot with few words. For example, his descriptions are often concise yet vivid.

In his short stories, Stephen King often gets straight to the point. For example, in 'The Mist', the horror starts quickly. In novels, he has more room to build up characters slowly. In short stories, he can create a quick shock like in 'Children of the Corn' where the horror is immediate. In novels, there's more complex world - building.

Unlike many other authors, Wolfe is not afraid to leave a lot unsaid in his short stories. He trusts the reader to fill in the gaps and piece together the story's deeper meaning. For example, he might use ambiguous endings or skip over certain events that other authors would feel the need to explain in detail. His language is also often more archaic - sounding and elaborate, adding to the sense of otherworldliness in his stories compared to the more modern and simple language used by some contemporary authors.

His writing style in these short stories is often very vivid. He uses detailed descriptions to create a sense of place and atmosphere. For example, in 'In the Hills, the Cities', you can almost feel the strange, otherworldly landscape he's creating.

Updike uses a rich vocabulary. He doesn't shy away from using complex words when they are needed to convey a precise meaning. This makes his writing more nuanced and engaging.

His writing style is quite concise. He gets to the point quickly without a lot of unnecessary fluff. He has a sharp eye for detail, which helps to bring his characters and settings to life vividly.

In a novel, the writing style can be more elaborate and flexible. Writers can use a wider range of literary devices and can afford to be more descriptive due to the length. In short stories, the writing style is often more concise and direct. Every word counts more. For example, a novelist might spend several paragraphs describing a character's appearance and background, while in a short story, it might be just a few sentences.