Is time travel fact not fiction? Provide some evidence.

I'm not sure specifically what evidence Tim Swartz presents. But he might refer to some of the strange time - related phenomena in physics, like the fact that time slows down for an object in motion relative to a stationary observer as per Einstein's relativity. This could be seen as a step towards the possibility of time travel.

Fiction. As of now, there's no scientific evidence to support the existence of time travel. While theories like Einstein's relativity suggest the possibility of time dilation, which is a different concept from the kind of time travel we see in movies. We can't just hop into a machine and go back to the dinosaurs or forward to the future at will.

Fiction. Consider this, in all of our exploration of the oceans, which is still not complete but quite extensive, we have not found any conclusive evidence of mermaids. The idea of a half - human, half - fish creature goes against the known biological principles. For a mermaid to exist as commonly depicted, it would require a very strange and unlikely combination of mammalian and fish - like characteristics that have no basis in evolutionary biology.

Fact. There has been new evidence emerging over time that supports the existence of megalodon in the past. Fossil records are a major part of this evidence. These fossils show the large size of their teeth and some skeletal remains which give us an idea of their massive size and structure. Also, studies on ancient ocean ecosystems suggest that an apex predator like megalodon could have thrived in those conditions.

Evolution is a fact. Evidence includes fossil records which display a clear sequence of life forms over time. For instance, the discovery of Archaeopteryx, a creature with both reptilian and avian features, is strong evidence for evolution.

Fiction. If we look at the history of mermaid claims, they are always based on something that can be rationally explained away. The new evidence, whatever it may be, probably falls into the same category. It could be a case of people seeing what they want to see or misidentifying something ordinary as a mermaid. There's no real evidence to suggest that these mythical creatures actually exist.

Regarding evidence for Moses, religious texts are a major source. The detailed accounts in the Torah, for instance, are seen as evidence by believers. But from a scientific and archaeological perspective, it's more complex. There are no inscriptions or artifacts that directly name Moses. However, some historians believe that the general story of a group of people leaving Egypt could be based on real events. And if there were such an event, it's likely there was a leader, which could be Moses. So, the evidence is not conclusive either way.

Time travel could be a fact because of wormholes. Wormholes are theoretical shortcuts in spacetime. If they exist and can be traversed, it would be a form of time travel. You could enter one end of a wormhole and emerge at a different time and place.

Fiction. Modern science has not been able to prove that time travel is possible. Scientists have explored concepts like time dilation, but this is not the same as actual time travel. Time dilation occurs in situations like when an object is moving at a high speed relative to another, but it doesn't allow for traveling to different historical or future periods in the way we imagine time travel.

It's fiction for now. There's no scientific evidence to prove time travel is possible currently. While some theories in physics like Einstein's relativity touch on time dilation, which can make time seem to pass differently in certain conditions, actual traveling back and forth in time remains in the realm of science fiction.